Skip to main content

Paper Highways; US Route 6 to San Francisco via Tioga Pass


On February 8th, 1937 US Route 6 was approved by the American Association of State Highway Officials to be extended to Long Beach, California from Greeley, Colorado.  The extension of US Route 6 to Long Beach is well documented due to it making the highway the longest US Route to have ever existed at 3,652 miles.  What is not well known regarding US Route 6 is that it's proposed extension to California included an alternative routing which would have seen the highway end in San Francisco upon crossing Tioga Pass of the Sierra Nevada Mountains through Yosemite National Park.  Pictured above is the proposed alignment US Route 6 to San Francisco via Tioga Pass drafted by the California Division of Highways during June 1935. 



The history of the two proposals to extend US Route 6 to San Francisco via Tioga Pass

Note; this blog is not intended to be a full historic brief on the corridor of the Tioga Pass Road and modern US Route 6.  A full historic synopsis of the Tioga Pass Road and modern US Route 6 can be found in the Gribblenation blog series via the links below:



With the above said, understanding why a US Route designation over Tioga Pass would be desirable does require an introductory knowledge of the backstory of the Tioga Pass Road.  The modern Tioga Pass Road runs from the Big Oak Flat Road at Crane Flat east to US Route 395 ("US 395").  The Tioga Pass Road is largely within the boundary of Yosemite National Park but is maintained by Caltrans as California State Route 120 ("CA 120") east of the Tioga Pass entry station to US 395.  The National Park Service maintained portion of the Tioga Pass Road serve as a implied connection between the two segments of CA 120.  The Tioga Pass Road is the highest elevation highway mountain pass in California reaching Tioga Pass at 9,945 feet above sea level.


Below CA 120 eastbound can be seen descending from Tioga Pass through Lee Vining Canyon towards Mono Lake. 


Tioga Pass first obtained noteworthiness when a mining expedition discovered silver at the Sheepherder Mine on Tioga Ridge during 1860.  The 1860 discovery of silver was not initially exploited and the finding largely fell into obscurity.  The Sheepherder silver claim was rediscovered in 1875 (1874 according to the Division of Highways) by William Brusky Jr.  Brusky wasn't able to obtain a sizeable piece of ore to bring to an assay until 1877.  Claims at Tioga Ridge were formally organized in 1878 which led to the establishment of the Tioga Mining District.  By 1880 the mining community of Dana at the site of the Great Sierra Mine had become large enough to warrant Post Office Service.  By 1881 the Great Sierra Consolidated Silver Company ("Great Sierra Company") bought out all the mining claims on Tioga Ridge.

Tioga Pass can be seen as "McLanes Pass" on the 1868 California Geological Survey Map of the Sierra Nevada Mountains near the vicinity of Yosemite Valley.

1868 California Geoloical Survey Map


The mines at Tioga Ridge were initially accessible by way of trails through Lundy Canyon and Bloody Pass.  The "Great Sierra Wagon Road" was proposed by the Great Sierra Company which had an estimated cost of $17,000 dollars in 1881 to construct a road from the Big Oak Flat Road near Crane Flat east to the Tioga Peak mines.  In 1882 the Great Sierra Company authorized a survey for a wagon road and railroad to the mines of Tioga Ridge which was completed by August during said year.  In July of 1882 the California & Yosemite Short Line Railroad was incorporated with the intended goal of also building a rail line to the Tioga Mining District.

By September of 1883 the Great Sierra Wagon Road had been completed east from the Big Oak Flat Road to the Tioga Mining District.  The Great Sierra Wagon Road never truly saw it's intended traffic load as the Tioga Mining District shuttered operations during mid-year 1884.  The Great Sierra Wagon Road was intended to be a tolled facility but there is no records of any money actually being collected.  As the years wore on the Great Sierra Wagon Road remained in periodic use but began to fall into disrepair due to a lack of maintenance.

In 1896 an appropriations bill to purchase the Great Sierra Wagon Road was proposed but never gained traction in the U.S. House of Representatives.  In 1899 the Army was directed by Congress to survey the Great Sierra Wagon Road.  The Army determined the Great Sierra Road while in a state of disrepair had been well engineered with an average gradient of 3%.  The Yosemite National Park commissioners found that the Great Sierra Wagon Road could be repaired for $2,000 dollars versus the cost of constructing a new highway for an estimated cost of approximately $61,000 dollars.  Yosemite National Park thusly formally recommended that the Federal Government acquire the Great Sierra Wagon Road.

The Tioga Pass Road can be seen ending at the Tioga Mining District on the 1906 Norris Peters Map of Yosemite National Park.  A trail over Mono Pass can be seen southeast of Tioga Pass.

1906 Norris Peters Map of Yosemite National Park




In 1899 what would become Legislative Route 40 ("LRN 40") was added to the State Highway System.  The original definition of what became LRN 40 according to CAhighways.org called for:

"locating and constructing a free wagon road from the Mono Lake Basin to and connecting with a wagon road called the "Tioga Road" and near the "Tioga Mine"

The Department of Public Works first considered building the eastern extension of the Tioga Road to Mono Basin first via an established pack trail over Bloody Pass.  By 1902 a new route via Lee Vining Canyon had been selected and construction began.  The September 1950 California Highways & Public Works cites that by 1910 construction through Lee Vining Canyon to the Tioga Mine had yet been completed to State standards.  A later Division of Highways article cites that LRN 40 east of Tioga Pass was completed during 1910.

September 1950 California Highways & Public Works




In 1911 the Federal Government brought a lawsuit against the franchise holders of the Great Sierra Wagon (referred to as the "Old Tioga Road").  The Federal suit argued that the Tioga Road had been long abandoned and sought to condemn the franchise rights so it could be incorporated as a Park Road.  Ultimately the law suit found that the owners of the Tioga Road had maintained it enough that their claims to ownership were valid.

The completed Tioga Pass Road can be seen in detail on the 1914 USGS Map of Yosemite National Park.

1914 USGS Map of Yosemite National Park





The concept of the Federal Government acquiring the Tioga Road within Yosemite National Park was not revisited until 1915.  Stephen Mather, Assistant to the Secretary of the Interior sought to improve automotive access to Yosemite National Park.  Mather learned that the purchase price of the Tioga Road within Yosemite National Park was $15,500 dollars.  Mather along with several other private contributors purchased the Tioga Road within Yosemite National Park.  The Tioga Road was subsequently purchased from Mather's group by the Federal Government for $10 dollars on April 10th, 1915.  The Tioga Pass Road was repaired and was opened to automotive traffic on July 28th, 1915.  The first year the Tioga Pass Road was opened to traffic only 190 cars entered Yosemite National Park via Tioga Pass.

Much of the above early history of the Tioga Pass Road within Yosemite National Park was cited from Yosemite.ca article on Tioga Pass.

Yosemite.ca on the Tioga Pass Road

According to CAhighways.org in 1915 Legislative Chapter 306 and 396 changed the definition of LRN 40 to include all of the segments Tioga Pass Road and Big Oak Flat Road which were not in within the boundary of Yosemite National Park:

"that portion of the Great Sierra Wagon Road, better known as the Tioga Road, lying without the boundary of Yosemite National Park, providing that the portion within the park is taken over by the federal government." Chapter 396 added "that certain toll road in Tuolumne and Mariposa counties known as the Big Oak Flat and Yosemite Toll Road beginning at a point near the former location of Jack Bell Sawmill in Tuolumne Cty and extending thence in an E-ly direction through a portion of Mariposa Cty at Hamilton Station, thence again into Tuolumne Cty, past the Hearden Ranch, Crocker Station, Crane Flat, and Gin Flat to the boundary line of the original Yosemite Grant near Cascade Creek"

More on LRN 40 can be found on CAhighways.org:

CAhighways.org on Legislative Route 40

On November 11th, 1926 the US Route System was approved by the U.S. Secretary of Agriculture.  The US Route System was intended to standardize corridors of national importance into a numeric grid intended to ease cross-country navigation.  Changes and additions to the US Route System were put under the governance of the American Association of State Highway Officials ("AASHO").  The initial run of US Routes approved by the California Highway Commission can seen in the January 1926 California Highways & Public Works

The initial run of Sign State Routes were announced in the August 1934 California Highways and Public Works.  CA 120 was announced as a new Sign State Route originating at US 99/LRN 4 in Manteca.  CA 120 as originally defined followed LRN 66 east to Oakdale, LRN 13 east to Yosemite Junction near Chinese Camp, LRN 40 to the Yosemite National Park boundary, the Tioga Pass Road through Yosemite National Park and LRN 40 via Mono Mills to CA 168 at Benton near the Nevada State Line.


As noted in the intro a June 1935 sketch map from the Division of Highways shows US 6 with two proposed alignments in California.  The first alignment shows US 6 entering California via CA 168 near Benton.  US 6 is shown terminating to the south at Long Beach by way of Owens Valley and Los Angeles.  The Benton-Long Beach proposed alignment of US 6 was a violation of it's even numbering which was intended to denote a US Route with a cardinal east/west orientation.  

The proposed alignment of US 6 to San Francisco via Tioga Pass would have maintained its east/west orientation.  The Tioga Pass-San Francisco alignment of US 6 is shown entering California via CA 168 to Benton, all of CA 120 west to US 50, US 50/LRN 5 over Altamont Pass to Hayward, LRN 105 from Hayward to the original 1929 San Mateo-Hayward Bridge, west over San Francisco Bay via the 1929 San Mateo-Hayward Bridge and north via multiplex of US 101/LRN 2 into downtown San Francisco.  

The AASHTO Database does not provide an explanation as to why US 6 to San Francisco via Tioga Pass was passed over in favor of the proposed extension to Long Beach.  A likely explanation would the then primitive nature of CA 120 west of Benton coupled that of the Tioga Pass Road.  The proposal to extend US 6 to Long Beach appears on the 1936 AASHO list of recommended additions to the US Route System. 



A December 1936 sketch map provided by the California Division of Highways shows the proposed extension of US 6 to Long Beach in detail. 


A letter dated February 1st, 1937 by the California State Highway Engineer to the AASHO Executive Secretary shows a detailed description of the planned extension of US 6 to Long Beach within California.  



A letter dated February 8th, 1937 by the AASHO Executive Secretary to the State Highway Engineers of; Colorado, Nevada and California announced the approved extension of US 6 from Greeley, Colorado to Long Beach, California.  




On September 17th, 1937 the Secretary of the Merced Chamber of Commerce sent a letter to the Bureau of Public Roads inquiring about the status of the proposal to extend US 6 to San Francisco via Tioga Pass.  


The Secretary of the Merced Chamber of Commerce in a October 2nd, 1937 sent a letter to the AASHO Executive Secretary proposing to add a alternative corridor to US 6 ("US 6A") which would terminate in San Francisco via Tioga Pass.  The Merced Chamber of Commerce requested the proposed US 6A depart from Yosemite National Park via CA 140 via the Yosemite-All Year Highway (completed between Mariposa and El Portal during July 1926) which would have it pass through the City of Merced.  The Merced Chamber of Commerce proposal cited a continuation of US 6A westward via CA 152 (it is unclear how US 6A would get to CA 152) over Pacheco Pass and US 101 into San Francisco.

The AASHO Executive Secretary on October 8th, 1937 noted in a reply to the Merced Chamber of Commerce Secretary that US 6 was already approved to be extended to Long Beach. 


The Merced Chamber of Commerce Secretary replied to the AASHO Executive Secretary on October 12th, 1937 asking the AASHO Executive Committee to take up the concept of US 6A to San Francisco via Tioga Pass for consideration.  The Merced Chamber of Commerce stated an argument that the Tioga Pass Road of Yosemite National Park carried enough merit to be promoted by the US Route System for the proposes of tourism.  

The AASHO Executive Secretary noted in a October 18th, 1937 reply the Merced Chamber of Commerce Secretary that alternate US Routes were no longer being considered by the AASHO Executive Committee.  The AASHO Executive Secretary did not fully dismiss the concept of a US Route over Tioga Pass and directed the Merced Chamber of Commerce Secretary to work with the California Division of Highways in creating a formal proposal.  It is appears that the Merced Chamber of Commerce did not pursue a US Route over Tioga Pass beyond October 1937.  Amusingly the the AASHO Executive Committee in the following years would go on to approve numerous alternative US Routes throughout the United States.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

North Carolina Continues to Move Forward with Rail

2023 and the first half of 2024 have seen continued growth in North Carolina's passenger rail system.  From increased daily trains from Raleigh to Charlotte, federal funds for studying additional corridors, and receiving a historic grant to begin the construction of high-speed rail between Raleigh and Richmond, the last 18 months have been a flurry of activity at NCDOT's Rail Division.  And that's just the tip of the iceberg. As ridership and routes increase - the engine of North Carolina passenger rail trains will become a more common sight. (Adam Prince) Increased Passenger Train Service: On July 10, 2023, a fourth Piedmont round-trip rail service between Raleigh and Charlotte commenced.  The four Piedmont trains plus the daily Carolinian (to Washington, DC, and New York) bring the total of trains serving the two cities daily to five. The current daily Piedmont and Carolinian schedule between Charlotte and Raleigh (NCDOT) The result was over 641,000 passengers utilized pa

US Route 101 in Benbow, Garberville and Redway

The communities of Benbow, Garberville and Redway can all be found along US Route 101 within southern Humboldt County.  The former surface alignment of US Route 101 in Garberville and Redway once crossed the Garberville Bluffs along what is now Redwood Drive via a corridor constructed as part of the Redwood Highway during the 1910s.  US Route 101 through Benbow, Garberville and Redway was modernized by 1935.  US Route 101 would eventually be upgraded to freeway standards in Benbow, Garberville and Redway by extension of the Redwood Freeway during 1966-68.  As the cover photo the original grade of US Route 101 and the Redwood Highway can be seen at the Garberville Bluffs during 1934.  US Route 101 can be seen in the communities of Benbow, Garberville and Redway on the 1935 Division of Highways Map of Humboldt County .   The history of US Route 101 in Benbow, Garberville and Redway Benbow, Garberville and Redway lie on the banks of the South Fork Eel River of southern Humboldt County.  D

The Midway Palm and Pine of US Route 99

Along modern day California State Route 99 south of Avenue 11 just outside the City limits of Madera one can find the Midway Palm and Pine in the center median of the freeway.  The Midway Palm and Pine denotes the halfway point between the Mexican Border and Oregon State Line on what was US Route 99.  The Midway Palm is intended to represent Southern California whereas the Midway Pine is intended to represent Northern California.  Pictured above the Midway Palm and Pine can be seen from the northbound lanes of the California State Route 99 Freeway.   This blog is part of the larger Gribblenation US Route 99 Page.  For more information pertaining to the other various segments of US Route 99 and it's three-digit child routes check out the link the below. Gribblenation US Route 99 Page The history of the Midway Palm and Pine The true timeframe for when the Midway Palm and Pine (originally a Deadora Cedar Tree) were planted is unknown.  In fact, the origin of the Midway Palm and Pine w