Skip to main content

Route and Directional Changes Coming to Triangle Area Roads

For Raleigh and Durham area motorists, construction and or new highways is the norm.  It is a growing region, and with that comes traffic, an endless sea of orange barrels, and testing of patience.  And the first half of 2022 will be no different - specifically around Research Triangle Park.

There are a few new numbers, and a directional change that I can see will cause some confusion to unfamiliar motorists.


First, the number changes.  Interstate 885 is coming - yes, sometime soon we hope - and as a result, the southern half of the Durham Freeway, currently NC 147, will have a new number.  Once the East End Connector opens, that's a big if, considering that CSX and NCDOT cannot get their act together, Interstate 885 will be born.  The new Interstate starts where US 70 meets Interstate 85 in Durham, continues along East US 70, cuts across the east side of Durham on the new connector, and then south on the Durham Freeway to Interstate 40.

As a result of the new Interstate 885, NCDOT has decided to renumber Toll NC 147, or the Triangle Parkway, to Toll NC 885.  Interstate 885 will transition to TOLL NC 885 at Interstate 40 and continue southeast to TOLL NC 540 near Morrisville.

There is no change to the number of NC 540 and its offshoots (TOLL and Interstate) - they will remain the same.  However, there is a directional change that could confuse motorists.  Currently, where I-540 changes to NC 540 at Interstate 40 in Western Wake County, NC 540 continues with the West direction until TOLL NC 147, where it changes to a North/South header.

These signs at the I-40 East (Exit 283) for I/NC 540 are going to change. You'll either go East or East. (Doug Kerr - 2014).

That's all going to change this Spring or by the Fall of 2023*.  At Interstate 40, where Interstate 540 West turns into NC 540, the direction will also change.  You will now be continuing on NC 540 EAST.  From this approach, this is no big deal - you are on 540 - it's now a black and white diamond vs. a red-white-blue Interstate - the West to East change will probably go unnoticed.

The planned new signaged for Interstate and NC 540 East (Exit 283) on Interstate 540. (NCDOT)

The new signage that will replace the 2014 photo from Doug Kerr.  Less shields - but the same direction.  Could it cause confusion for out-of-towners? (NCDOT)

However, if you want to get on 540 (either version) from Interstate 40, it'll be a little confusing as your choices will only be EAST or EAST.  And if you are unfamiliar with the difference between I-540 and NC 540 - well, you're chances of making a wrong turn are going to go up.

Along Interstate 40 West, NCDOT will only re-sticker the West NC 540 with an East Banner. (NCDOT)

Is it a big deal?  Probably not.  Am I writing this just for content?  Maybe.  But as the sign plans show - you're going to have 540 East and 540 East to choose from at the split on the flyover ramp from I-40 East.  If you are on I-40 West - you don't have the split ramp, but you'll have to decide which exit to use.

Why is this being done?  Maybe to prepare for NC 540's extension to I-40 in Garner? 540 will be more of an East/West Route at that time.  Of course, when 540 eventually gets around the corner and up to Knightdale, we'll have a West/West fun. 

The changes aren't anything new - as this is the same part of the state that had different routes on and off the Beltline during the 1980s/90s, Inner/Outer Beltline for a time, I-540 was North/South for a bit and then went entirely East/West, NC 540 was signed as Interstate 540 and changed right before it opened, and let's not forget I-495 to I-87 along US 64 in Eastern Wake County.  Speaking of the Inner/Outer concept - why not go back to it for 540.  Yes, it didn't work for the Beltline, but it does work with I-485 in Charlotte.

*: The contract should be finished by September 2023, so hey, maybe it'll change again.  

Sources & Links:




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I-40 rockslide uncovers old debates on highway

The Asheville Citizen-Times continues to do a great job covering all the angles of the Interstate 40 Haywood County rock slide. An article in Sunday's edition provides a strong historical perspective on how the Pigeon River routing of Interstate 40 came about. And perhaps most strikingly, in an article that ran just prior to the highway's opening in the fall of 1968, how engineers from both Tennessee and North Carolina warned "...that slides would probably be a major problem along the route for many years." On February 12, 1969, not long after the Interstate opened, the first rock slide that would close I-40 occurred. Like many other Interstates within North Carolina, Interstate 40 through the mountains has a history prior to formation of the Interstate Highway System and was also a heated political battle between local communities. The discussion for a road that would eventually become Interstate 40 dates back to the 1940's as the idea for interregional high

Mines Road

Mines Road is an approximately twenty-eight-mile highway located in the rural parts of the Diablo Range east of the San Francisco Bay Area.  Mines Road begins in San Antonio Valley in Santa Clara County and terminates at Tesla Road near Livermore of Alameda County.  The highway essentially is a modern overlay of the 1840s Mexican haul trail up Arroyo Mocho known as La Vereda del Monte.  The modern corridor of Mines Road took shape in the early twentieth century following development of San Antonio Valley amid a magnesite mining boom.  Part 1; the history of Mines Road Modern Mines Road partially overlays the historic corridor used by La Vereda del Monte (Mountain Trail).  La Vereda del Monte was part of a remote overland route through the Diablo Range primarily used to drive cattle from Alta California to Sonora.  The trail was most heavily used during the latter days of Alta California during the 1840s. La Vereda del Monte originated at Point of Timber between modern day Byron and Bre

Former California State Route 41 past Bates Station

When California State Route 41 was commissioned during August 1934 it was aligned along the then existing Fresno-Yosemite Road north of the San Joaquin River.  Within the Sierra Nevada foothills of Madera County, the original highway alignment ran past Bates Station via what is now Madera County Road 209, part of eastern Road 406 and Road 207.   Bates Station was a stage station plotted during the early 1880s at what was the intersection of the Coarsegold Road and Stockton-Los Angeles Road.   The modern alignment bypassing Bates Station to the east would be reopened to traffic during late 1939.   Part 1; the history of California State Route 41 past Bates Station Bates Station was featured as one of the many 1875-1899 Madera County era towns in the May 21, 1968, Madera Tribune .  Post Office Service at Bates Station is noted to have been established on November 23, 1883 and ran continuously until October 31, 1903.  The postal name was sourced from Bates Station owner/operator George Ba