Skip to main content

Construction Update: Newburgh-Beacon Bridge deck replacement project reaches Important Milestone


The dual-span Newburgh-Beacon Bridge (Interstate 84) spans the Hudson River at Newburgh, NY

A major milestone has been reached in the ongoing project to replace the deck of the westbound span of the Newburgh-Beacon Bridge (Interstate 84) in Newburgh, NY. The New York State Bridge Authority (NYSBA) commenced this project in June 2020 in order to extend the useful service life of the westbound bridge by another 40 years while improving safety for travelers by upgrading bridge railings & parapets and expansion joints to modern design & operational standards. The entirety of the nearly 8,000 ft long deck is being removed down to the steel stringers and a new concrete deck will be cast and poured, complete with modified expansion joints and taller bridge parapets that meet modern interstate highway standards. Altogether, this project involves replacing about 350,000 square feet of deck space and is being executed in two distinct phases. The phase that was just completed in November (hence the “important milestone” headline…) saw the replacement of the southern half of the bridge deck in the manor described above. With this phase complete, contractors will now repeat the same process for the northern half of the deck in the coming year.

Westbound views while crossing the single open lane of the westbound Newburgh-Beacon Bridge in November 2021. Traffic crosses the bridge on the newly-complete southern half of rebuilt deck while work  proceeds on the northern half in the next year. Click on each photo to see a larger version.

As with any other major interstate highway/bridge project, the maintenance & protection of traffic has proven challenging for the client agency and its prime contractor. In order to fast track completion and provide as much contractor access to the westbound bridge deck as possible, a temporary two-way traffic pattern was implemented on the eastbound span of the bridge in a “two lanes per direction” configuration. The westbound bridge has largely been closed to all traffic during off-peak hours, however a single lane of traffic is allowed to cross this span during peak periods as it serves as an extended on-ramp for traffic entering the westbound interstate from Route 9D & Beacon. (During off-peak periods, this on-ramp traffic is funneled onto the two-way eastbound span traffic pattern.) This two-way traffic pattern on the eastbound bridge has also created an artificial and temporary traffic bottleneck, as the original configuration of the two spans allowed for three lanes of traffic per direction under normal conditions. Traffic backups related to this project can stretch several miles in either direction on a normal day and this situation is not helped by the fact that the lack of shoulders in this temporary traffic setup prevents disabled vehicles from moving out of travel lanes, which increases the likelihood of traffic jams and rubbernecking delays.


Eastbound views while crossing the eastbound span of the Newburgh-Beacon Bridge. The two-way traffic pattern has temporarily constrained the flow of traffic in the area; on the other hand, the implementation of cashless tolling and removal of the old toll plaza has been a positive development. Click on each photo to see a larger version.

Being built in parallel with this redecking project is the conversion of this bridge (and its sister bridges under NYSBA jurisdiction) to all-electronic toll collection; the tolling gantry located on the Beacon approach just upstream from the old toll plaza was built in the spring of 2021 and the cashless tolling system for this bridge went live in July. The old 1980-built toll plaza has been subsequently demolished in recent months and ongoing road works remain to be completed on the Beacon approach in the coming year. As a life-long resident of southern Dutchess County, NY (except for those few years I was in college out in Buffalo, NY), my single least-favorite toll plaza in the entire country (and I’ve been through a few…) was right here in Beacon. The plaza was a chronic source of traffic congestion at most times and on most days as there were no high-speed EZ-Pass (the electronic toll tag used/accepted by agencies around the northeastern U.S.) lanes and cars still had to nearly come to a stop in the EZ-Pass lanes the plaza did have since NYSBA used automated toll gates that impeded the flow of traffic through. All in all, this is a toll plaza I’m very pleased to see fade into history and this entire stretch of I-84 between Newburgh and Fishkill should move a lot quicker and smoother once this project is completed.


Assorted aerial views of the dual-span bridges including a look at construction progress on the westbound bridge deck and toll plaza reconstruction. Click on each photo to see a larger version.

The two-year, $101 million contract issued by NYSBA is being executed by a contracting outfit led by Yonkers Contracting Company of Yonkers, NY. Major construction & substantial completion, including finishing the remaining work for the new bridge deck, is expected for late 2022 with final completion & close-out of additional punchlist items planned for the first half of 2023. The completion of these final milestones will be welcome news to Hudson Valley (and also long-distance) travelers already tired of the traffic headaches associated with this project. While I’m no fan of sitting in stuck traffic due to construction, this is one of those projects I consider to be absolutely vital for the local and regional economy. This is the first major overhaul for this span of the bridge since the early 1980s and it’s a project that’s been postponed for several years already due to funding restrictions. I will be more than happy to put up with a little inconvenience now in exchange for having a fully functional safe and sound bridge for the next few decades.


Assorted aerial views of the dual-span bridges spanning the Hudson River at Newburgh, NY. Click on each photo to see a larger version.

How to Get There:




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I-40 rockslide uncovers old debates on highway

The Asheville Citizen-Times continues to do a great job covering all the angles of the Interstate 40 Haywood County rock slide. An article in Sunday's edition provides a strong historical perspective on how the Pigeon River routing of Interstate 40 came about. And perhaps most strikingly, in an article that ran just prior to the highway's opening in the fall of 1968, how engineers from both Tennessee and North Carolina warned "...that slides would probably be a major problem along the route for many years." On February 12, 1969, not long after the Interstate opened, the first rock slide that would close I-40 occurred. Like many other Interstates within North Carolina, Interstate 40 through the mountains has a history prior to formation of the Interstate Highway System and was also a heated political battle between local communities. The discussion for a road that would eventually become Interstate 40 dates back to the 1940's as the idea for interregional high

Interstate 210 the Foothill Freeway

The combined Interstate 210/California State Route 210 corridor of the Foothill Freeway is approximately 85.31-miles.  The Interstate 210/California State Route 210 corridor begins at Interstate 5 at the northern outskirts of Los Angeles and travels east to Interstate 10 in Redlands of San Bernardino County.  Interstate 210 is presently signed on the 44.9-mile segment of the Foothill Freeway between Interstate 5 and California State Route 57.  California State Route 210 makes up the remaining 40.41 miles of the Foothill Freeway east to Interstate 10.  Interstate 210 is still classified by the Federal Highway Administration as existing on what is now signed as California State Route 57 from San Dimas south to Interstate 10.  The focus of this blog will mostly be on the history of Interstate 210 segment of the Foothill Freeway.   Part 1; the history of Interstate 210 and California State Route 210 Interstate 210 (I-210) was approved as a chargeable Interstate during September of

Former California State Route 41 past Bates Station

When California State Route 41 was commissioned during August 1934 it was aligned along the then existing Fresno-Yosemite Road north of the San Joaquin River.  Within the Sierra Nevada foothills of Madera County, the original highway alignment ran past Bates Station via what is now Madera County Road 209, part of eastern Road 406 and Road 207.   Bates Station was a stage station plotted during the early 1880s at what was the intersection of the Coarsegold Road and Stockton-Los Angeles Road.   The modern alignment bypassing Bates Station to the east would be reopened to traffic during late 1939.   Part 1; the history of California State Route 41 past Bates Station Bates Station was featured as one of the many 1875-1899 Madera County era towns in the May 21, 1968, Madera Tribune .  Post Office Service at Bates Station is noted to have been established on November 23, 1883 and ran continuously until October 31, 1903.  The postal name was sourced from Bates Station owner/operator George Ba