Skip to main content

Paper Highways; California State Route 64 the unbuilt Malibu Canyon-Whitnall Freeway

This issue of Paper Highways examines the history of unbuilt California State Route 64; the Malibu-Whitnall Freeway.



The History of unbuilt California State Route 64 and the Malibu Canyon-Whitnall Freeway

CA 64 is an unbuilt freeway which would have originated at CA 1 near Malibu in Los Angeles County.  CA 64 was intended ascend the Santa Monica Mountains northward via Malibu Creek where it would have briefly entered Ventura County near Calabasas (this segment would have been known as the Malibu Canyon Freeway).  CA 64 from the Ventura County line would have swung east to the junction of I-5/Golden State Freeway and CA 170/Hollywood Freeway (this segment was to be named the Whitnall Freeway).  CA 64 if constructed would have been about 30 miles in length.




According to CAhighways.org the origin of CA 64 can be traced back to 1958 when plans for the Whitnall Freeway were announced.  The Whitnall Freeway was named after a Los Angeles City Planner by the name of Gordon Whitnall.  Gordon Whitnall had a major hand in roadway development in the City of Los Angeles during the early 20th Century.  The planned Whitnall Freeway was adopted into the State Highway System in 1959 as part of Legislative Route 265.

LRN 265 was originally intended to end at CA 1 via the corridor of Malibu Canyon Road.  LRN 265 was to have ended at US 99/LRN 4 at the planned route of the Golden State Freeway.  LRN 265 can be seen for the first time on the 1960 Division of Highways State Map.


According to CAhighways.org the route of LRN 265 through the Santa Monica Mountains was first studied in 1963.  LRN 265 was reassigned as CA 64 during the 1964 State Highway Renumber.  CA 64 can be seen for the first time on the 1964 Division of Highways State Map.  CA 64 is shown to having a planned terminus at I-5/US 99 on the Golden State Freeway and a junction with CA 170 on the planned Hollywood Freeway extension. 


The Malibu Canyon-Whitnall Freeway appears in the March/April 1965 California Highways & Public Works Guide in an article regarding planning studies.





The Malibu Canyon-Whitnall Freeway alignment is shown to have been discussed by the California Highway Commission on June 8th 1966 in the November-December 1966 California Highways & Public Works Guide.


The planned route of CA 64 is shown to have been shifted to a terminus at a mutual junction with the Hollywood Freeway and Golden State Freeway on the 1967 Division of Highways State Map.


The 1967 Division of Highways Map shows CA 64 to have an adopted alignment from CA 1 at Malibu Cree north of Calabasas.


The planned junction of CA 1 and CA 64 at Malibu Creek is shown in a 2015 Malibu Surf article.


The entire route of CA 64 is shown to have a fully adopted alignment on the 1969 Division of Highways State Map.



According to CAhighways CA 64 between CA 1 and US 101 was deleted from the Freeway & Expressway System during November 1970.  The alignment of CA 64 between US 101 and I-5/CA 170 was rescinded by the California Transportation Commission during July 1973.  The reminder of CA 64 between US 101 and CA 170/I-5 was deleted from the Freeway & Expressway System during January of 1976.  CA 64 appears without an adopted alignment on the 1975 Caltrans State Map.


Despite having it's adopted alignment abandoned long ago the State Legislative has yet to delete CA 64.  CA 64 still appears as a planned highway on the 2005 Caltrans Map.



Had the Malibu Canyon-Whitnall Freeway been constructed it's approach from I-5 south would have likely been a split junction with CA 170/Hollywood Freeway.  One can almost imagine CA 64 been co-signed with CA 170 at an Exit from I-5 south.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Paper Highways; California State Route 1 through the Lost Coast

For all the accolades and praise that California State Route 1 gets for being a top notch coastal highway one fact tends to get overlooked; the highway was never finished!  In this edition of Paper Highways we look at the failed path of California State Route 1 through the Lost Coast.



Part 1; the history of Legislative Route 56 and California Route 1 through the Lost Coast

The Lost Coast region consists of the undeveloped coastal areas of Humboldt County, Mendocino County, and the King Range.  The Lost Coast region roughly spans from near Rockport in Mendocino County north to Ferndale of Humboldt County.  The Lost Coast region is known for having rugged terrain which rivals what is seen in Big Sur.  The Lost Coast has several small communities such as; Shelter Cove, Whitehorn, and Petrolia.

In 1933 Legislative Route 56 was extended south to LRN 2 (US 101) near Las Cruces and north to Ferndale to LRN 1 (also US 101).  Prior to 1933 the legislative description of LRN 56 had it's nort…

US Route 99 to Visalia?...

Something that I noticed awhile back while doing map research regarding US Route 99 in Fresno was that the highway intended to be originally routed through the City of Visalia.



The early originally planned alignment of US Route 99 in Visalia

To be clear US 99 was never actually routed through Visalia and ended up bypassing the City in favor of a direct route from Goshen southeast to Tulare.  US 99 within San Joaquin Valley was aligned over Legislative Route 4 which in turn was added to the State Highway System as part of the 1909 First State Highway Bond Act.  LRN 4 for a time was aligned through Visalia via; Mineral King Avenue, Main Street, and Mooney Boulevard.  This early alignment of LRN 4 through Visalia can be seen on the 1924 Division of Highways State Map.


The initial draft of the US Route System was approved by the Secretary of Agriculture during November of 1925.  The US Route System with in California was approved by California Highway Commission with no changes recommended…

Where the hell is Hill Valley? (US Route 8 south/US Route 395 east)

Recently I made a visit to Universal Studios near Los Angeles.  While on the back lot tour I came across a piece of infamous movie-borne fictional highway infamy; the location of town square of Hill Valley, California on US Route 8/US Route 395.


The above photo is part of the intro scene to the first Back-to-the-Future movie which was set in 1985. To anyone who follows roadways the signage error of US 8 meeting US 395 in California is an immediately notable error.  For one; US 8 doesn't even exist anywhere near California with present alignment being signed as an east/west highway between Norway, Michigan and Forest Lake, Minnesota.  To make matters worse US 8 is signed as a southbound route and US 395 (a north/south highway) is signed as an eastbound route.  At minimum the cut-out US 8 and US 395 shields somewhat resemble what Caltrans used in the 1980s.

Assuming Hill Valley is located on what would have been US 395 by 1985 what locales would be a viable real world analog?  US 39…