Skip to main content

2016 Fall Mountain Trip Part 2; the Panamint Gap in California State Route 178

Picking up from where I left off in Part 1 I made my way up Trona Road to California State Route 178 east of Ridgecrest in northwest San Bernardino County.  Approaching Searles Valley there is a gap in CA 178 as the route was never built east through the Panamint Range.






Incidentally Part 1 of this series can be found here:

2016 Fall Mountain Trip Part 1; Garlock, CA ghost town


CA 178 as it was originally envisioned ran east from US 101 through to CA 7 in Mojave Desert.  The original iteration of CA 178 can be seen on this 1938 California State Highway Map, by 1938 CA 7 at the eastern terminus of CA 178 had become part of US Route 6.

1938 California State Highway Map 

By 1947 Legislative Route Number 212 was adopted which was a planned route from the eastern terminus of CA 178 across the Panamint Range to CA 127.  More information can be found on CAhighways.org regarding LRN 212.

CAhighways.org on LRN 212

On the 1948 State Highway Map LRN 212 can be seen running east from US 6 to Trona where a planned route is shown crossing the Panamint Range.  LRN 212 resumes in Death Valley and is shown continuing east of CA 127 to the Nevada State Line.

1948 California State Highway Map

By 1954 a new proposed alignment across the Panamint Range appears on the State Highway Map.

1954 California State Highway Map

By the 1964 State Highway Renumbering LRN 212 became part of CA 178.

1964 California State Highway Map

It is unlikely the gap in CA 178 over the Panamint Range will ever be complete.  Building a highway across the southern part of the Panamint Range would be costly and serve little in terms of moving traffic.  The defacto connection between the Panamint Gap in CA 178 is largely served by roads through Panamint Valley, CA 190 and Badwater Road in Death Valley National Park.  

Part 3 of this blog series can found here:

Part 3; Panamint Valley and Trona-Wildrose Road

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I-40 rockslide uncovers old debates on highway

The Asheville Citizen-Times continues to do a great job covering all the angles of the Interstate 40 Haywood County rock slide. An article in Sunday's edition provides a strong historical perspective on how the Pigeon River routing of Interstate 40 came about. And perhaps most strikingly, in an article that ran just prior to the highway's opening in the fall of 1968, how engineers from both Tennessee and North Carolina warned "...that slides would probably be a major problem along the route for many years." On February 12, 1969, not long after the Interstate opened, the first rock slide that would close I-40 occurred. Like many other Interstates within North Carolina, Interstate 40 through the mountains has a history prior to formation of the Interstate Highway System and was also a heated political battle between local communities. The discussion for a road that would eventually become Interstate 40 dates back to the 1940's as the idea for interregional high

Interstate 210 the Foothill Freeway

The combined Interstate 210/California State Route 210 corridor of the Foothill Freeway is approximately 85.31-miles.  The Interstate 210/California State Route 210 corridor begins at Interstate 5 at the northern outskirts of Los Angeles and travels east to Interstate 10 in Redlands of San Bernardino County.  Interstate 210 is presently signed on the 44.9-mile segment of the Foothill Freeway between Interstate 5 and California State Route 57.  California State Route 210 makes up the remaining 40.41 miles of the Foothill Freeway east to Interstate 10.  Interstate 210 is still classified by the Federal Highway Administration as existing on what is now signed as California State Route 57 from San Dimas south to Interstate 10.  The focus of this blog will mostly be on the history of Interstate 210 segment of the Foothill Freeway.   Part 1; the history of Interstate 210 and California State Route 210 Interstate 210 (I-210) was approved as a chargeable Interstate during September of

Former California State Route 41 past Bates Station

When California State Route 41 was commissioned during August 1934 it was aligned along the then existing Fresno-Yosemite Road north of the San Joaquin River.  Within the Sierra Nevada foothills of Madera County, the original highway alignment ran past Bates Station via what is now Madera County Road 209, part of eastern Road 406 and Road 207.   Bates Station was a stage station plotted during the early 1880s at what was the intersection of the Coarsegold Road and Stockton-Los Angeles Road.   The modern alignment bypassing Bates Station to the east would be reopened to traffic during late 1939.   Part 1; the history of California State Route 41 past Bates Station Bates Station was featured as one of the many 1875-1899 Madera County era towns in the May 21, 1968, Madera Tribune .  Post Office Service at Bates Station is noted to have been established on November 23, 1883 and ran continuously until October 31, 1903.  The postal name was sourced from Bates Station owner/operator George Ba