Skip to main content

Utica Mills Covered Bridge - Maryland

 


The Utica Mills Covered Bridge near Lewistown in Frederick County, Maryland has a bit of an interesting history to it. At first glance, it appears like a bucolic Burr truss arch designed covered bridge that spans about 88 feet over Fishing Creek. But the timbers used for this historic covered bridge are not at its original location.

The materials used for the Utica Mills Covered Bridge were originally used for the old Devilbiss Covered Bridge over the nearby Monocacy River. That bridge was a two span covered bridge of about 250 feet in length and it was built in 1843. However, devastating flooding in May 1889 along the Monocacy River caused the bridge to wash away, and this was from the same storm system that caused the famously disastrous floods in Johnstown, Pennsylvania. In my research, I found that the flooding in Maryland was also referred to as the Johnstown Floods, so the events are related. Fortunately, one span of the old Devilbiss Covered Bridge was saved, dismantled and then two years later in 1891, it was reconstructed as a covered bridge on Utica Road. Although the covered bridge was moved from its original location over the Monocacy River, it still consists of original timber from the Devilbiss Covered Bridge, so it was able to retain its initial build date as 1843 and the bridge was renamed Utica Mills Covered Bridge.

In 1934, renovations to the Utica Mills Covered Bridge took place. The flooring was reinforced with steel beams and a center pier was added for additional support. However, gradual corrosion of the steel beams had reduced the bridge's load capacity to only two tons. In 1993, an oversized truck cracked one of the bridge's support beams. Residents initially feared that it was caused by an act of an extortionist who had threatened to burn the bridge if the community persisted in fighting a public project he favored. After the 1993 accident, it was discovered that termites and post beetles had caused much of the bridge's timber to rot. So maybe it wasn't the extortionist at all.

In December 1996, a rehabilitation project the for Utica Mills Covered Bridge began at a cost of $337,000. The project was under the general contractor guidance of famed bridge builders Arnold M. Graton Associates of Ashland, New Hampshire. The rehabilitation project included replacing the steel beams which thereby increased the bridge's load limit to fifteen tons. Meanwhile, much of the tedious repair labor was done manually using hand tools. The Utica Mills Covered Bridge was the last of the three remaining historic covered bridges in Frederick County to be rehabilitated during the 1990s. The covered bridge reopened to traffic in the spring of 1997.

On June 15, 2006, the Utica Mills Covered Bridge was again damaged by a truck. The bridge's roof beam, braces and siding on the west end of the portal were destroyed when the truck tried to back out of the bridge. The bridge was closed for three weeks until $15,000 worth in repairs could be made.

In 2011, The National Historic Covered Bridge Preservation Program awarded a $176,400 grant to Frederick County for repairs to the three historic covered bridges located within the friendly confines of the county. Frederick County kicked in another $44,100 to bring the total funding amount to $220,500. The contract to repair the bridges was awarded to Kinsley Construction, Inc., a company that has plenty of experience rehabilitating covered bridges in Maryland and Pennsylvania. Work to rehabilitate the Utica Mills Covered Bridge  started in the spring of 2015.

When I visited the Utica Mills Covered Bridge on New Year's Eve Day in December 2021, more recent repairs had recently taken place. The covered bridge was damaged again in June 2021 when a box truck that exceeded the height clearance of the bridge passed through the bridge damaging many of the beams. When I visited, the beams had been replaced and the bridge was given a fresh paint job. Adding warning poles near each end of the bridge has been discussed to remedy the issue of over height vehicles trying to use the bridge. The warning poles tend to be quite effective in preventing damage to covered bridges. But in the case of the Utica Mills Covered Bridge, the land surrounding the bridge is all private property, so Frederick County would need to acquire a right of way for the structures and an area for vehicles to turn around if the vehicles are too tall.







How to Get There:



Sources and Links:
Maryland Covered Bridges - Utica Mills Covered Bridge
Bridgehunter.com - Utica Mills Covered Bridge
The Frederick News-Post - Out of Commission: Damage to Utica Road covered bridge to be determined (June 28, 2021)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I-40 rockslide uncovers old debates on highway

The Asheville Citizen-Times continues to do a great job covering all the angles of the Interstate 40 Haywood County rock slide. An article in Sunday's edition provides a strong historical perspective on how the Pigeon River routing of Interstate 40 came about. And perhaps most strikingly, in an article that ran just prior to the highway's opening in the fall of 1968, how engineers from both Tennessee and North Carolina warned "...that slides would probably be a major problem along the route for many years." On February 12, 1969, not long after the Interstate opened, the first rock slide that would close I-40 occurred. Like many other Interstates within North Carolina, Interstate 40 through the mountains has a history prior to formation of the Interstate Highway System and was also a heated political battle between local communities. The discussion for a road that would eventually become Interstate 40 dates back to the 1940's as the idea for interregional high

Interstate 210 the Foothill Freeway

The combined Interstate 210/California State Route 210 corridor of the Foothill Freeway is approximately 85.31-miles.  The Interstate 210/California State Route 210 corridor begins at Interstate 5 at the northern outskirts of Los Angeles and travels east to Interstate 10 in Redlands of San Bernardino County.  Interstate 210 is presently signed on the 44.9-mile segment of the Foothill Freeway between Interstate 5 and California State Route 57.  California State Route 210 makes up the remaining 40.41 miles of the Foothill Freeway east to Interstate 10.  Interstate 210 is still classified by the Federal Highway Administration as existing on what is now signed as California State Route 57 from San Dimas south to Interstate 10.  The focus of this blog will mostly be on the history of Interstate 210 segment of the Foothill Freeway.   Part 1; the history of Interstate 210 and California State Route 210 Interstate 210 (I-210) was approved as a chargeable Interstate during September of

Former California State Route 41 past Bates Station

When California State Route 41 was commissioned during August 1934 it was aligned along the then existing Fresno-Yosemite Road north of the San Joaquin River.  Within the Sierra Nevada foothills of Madera County, the original highway alignment ran past Bates Station via what is now Madera County Road 209, part of eastern Road 406 and Road 207.   Bates Station was a stage station plotted during the early 1880s at what was the intersection of the Coarsegold Road and Stockton-Los Angeles Road.   The modern alignment bypassing Bates Station to the east would be reopened to traffic during late 1939.   Part 1; the history of California State Route 41 past Bates Station Bates Station was featured as one of the many 1875-1899 Madera County era towns in the May 21, 1968, Madera Tribune .  Post Office Service at Bates Station is noted to have been established on November 23, 1883 and ran continuously until October 31, 1903.  The postal name was sourced from Bates Station owner/operator George Ba