Skip to main content

Franklin D. Roosevelt Parkway Proposal from Hyde Park, New York to the Taconic State Parkway

 


President Franklin Delano Roosevelt had a decades long history with the development of parkways. You can even say that he was a bit of an armchair highway engineer. In 1925, he was named the first commissioner of the Taconic State Park Commission (TSPC) in New York State and was instrumental in the early construction of what is today the Taconic State Parkway, even as he clashed with the legendary Robert Moses. Roosevelt wanted the parkway to provide splendid views for motorists traveling up and down the Hudson Valley. As President, Roosevelt supported efforts for parkways to be built, whether they were constructed, such as the Blue Ridge Parkway in North Carolina and Virginia, or ultimately canceled, such as the proposed Green Mountain Parkway in Vermont. But I was still surprised to find out that FDR himself had proposed the construction from the Taconic State Parkway to the Franklin D. Roosevelt Library and Museum that was being built near the Franklin D. Roosevelt home in Hyde Park, New York. While researching various proposals on the Taconic State Parkway, I stumbled upon a number of documents from NPSHistory.com regarding a road that President Roosevelt had proposed between the parkway and Hyde Park.

Our story begins in December 1939 when President Roosevelt read an article in "The Star", which I can assume to be the Poughkeepsie Evening Star and Enterprise, a newspaper in circulation at the time. In the article, Paul T. Winslow, the Executive Secretary of the Taconic State Park Commission at the time, was quoted as saying that there was a need to construct suitable east-west roads in Dutchess County to connect with the north-south Taconic State Parkway that was being built at the time. Roosevelt saw that it was a good time to write a letter to Winslow so he could suggest that a road be built to the library and museum being constructed at the time. Roosevelt suggested several possible routes for a highway that would lead from Washington Hollow or just south of there (approximately where the Taconic State Parkway meets with US 44 today) to either East Park and Hyde Park or to a connection with the Albany Post Road (also known as US 9) just south of the proposed library. Additionally, Roosevelt suggested that a road of this kind should follow existing roads as much as possible, but noted that there is virtually no existing road that runs east-west from Washington Hollow to the Hyde Park line, unless you go north as far as Salt Point. This lack of direct connectivity between Hyde Park and the Washington Hollow area still exists today, as you would have to take a mish-mosh of local, county and state roads between the two areas. However, once you reach the Hyde Park line, Roosevelt mentioned that the existing road to East Park and Hyde Park village is available for parkway use, and at a point from one to two miles south existing roads could be used for half the distance. With Roosevelt's correspondence to Winslow, he enclosed a map with a rough design of where the proposed road could be built.

By September 1940, the parkway proposal picked up some steam, but still lacked a proposed name. Correspondence from the National Park Service presented a proposal with a parkway of approximately 9 miles in length connecting US 9 opposite the Franklin D. Roosevelt Library with Section #6 of the Eastern State Parkway (now known as the Taconic State Parkway) at a hilltop northeast of Pleasant Valley. The parkway was to be built to similar standards as the Taconic State Parkway with a 400 foot right of way, and estimated construction costs of about $1,000,000 in 1940 dollars. The estimate was based on an average mile cost of state parkway construction of $100,000 to $125,000 per mile and that the land values for the purchase of the right of way would vary between $50 to $200 per acre. The westernmost 4 miles of the parkway would cross lands in Hyde Park owned by President Franklin D. Roosevelt and it was suggested that it could be arranged to have the necessary right of way for this part of the parkway to be free of cost for the project. One of Roosevelt's requirements was that any stretch of the parkway that were located on his properties should be located so as to avoid a hilltop site in which he has selected to develop for his own use at some future time. It should be noted that Roosevelt had an extensive amount of property in Hyde Park and he had listed his occupation as a tree farmer on his tax forms, so he had interest in maintaining the local scenery in a natural, yet spectacular state. The topography on which the parkway could have been constructed is such that the main ridges of the hills in the area run generally north and south. This meant that a parkway (or any road) running east and west would have to be carefully located if unnecessary scars on the countryside were to be avoided. That condition applied more particularly to the eastern portion of the proposed parkway where the hills are quite pronounced and definite in their formations. The National Park Service also considered that the proposed parkway to Hyde Park would also serve visitors to the Vanderbilt Mansion National Historic Site, which is also located in Hyde Park, but cautioned at the time that any studies to construct a national parkway would be preliminary at this time.

The parkway proposal was put on the back burner during World War II, but was revisited during the fall of 1945. President Franklin D. Roosevelt passed away earlier in the year and the proposed parkway was given the name of Franklin D. Roosevelt Parkway. The Taconic State Park Commission felt there was more justification to build the parkway in the postwar era, with a new estimated total cost of $2,500,000. Correspondence sent by Paul Winslow of the TSPC to Newton Drury of the National Park Service and Secretary of the Interior Harold Ickes suggested a mix of federal and state funds for construction and maintenance to be undertaken pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Aid Highway Act of 1944; with federal funds to be used for construction, while New York State would fund land acquisition and future maintenance. The response from the National Park Service in layman's terms was that it could not be a national parkway, but they were willing to consider the parkway as a state highway project. Under the Federal Aid Highway Act of 1944, the it authorizes parkways connecting only with national parks and national monuments, that the right of way of parkways would need to be deeded to the federal government and that the future maintenance of the parkway to be accomplished under appropriations made to the National Park Service. The federal suggestion was if New York State would initiate a project to have this spur parkway placed on the State 7% Federal-Aid system, the federal government then could participate in the acquisition of the right of way for up to 30% of the cost and in the cost of construction up to 50% of the cost. At the time, New York State had 790 miles of undesignated 7% highways and that the proposed Franklin D. Roosevelt Parkway project would be eligible as a Federal-Aid project as it would connect to US 9, a Federal-Aid Highway in its own right. It was also suggested that the start of the spur road might be planned where the proposed Taconic State Parkway intersected with US 44, about a mile south of the line suggested by the Franklin D. Roosevelt. From a federal public roads point of view, there would have been no objection to the New York State Highway Commission and the Taconic State Park Commission entering into an agreement where New York State would agree to maintain the parkway spur as a part of the state parkway system. The response from TSPC on November 28, 1945 was if any provisions or revisions were needed so a request in the 1946-1947 budget could be made for land acquisition. But the response on December 3, 1945 from James F. Evans, the director of the New York State Division of Parks was in response to Interior Secretary Ickes. That response stated that the construction of the Franklin D. Roosevelt Parkway would not work as a Federal Aid Highway because there was not enough Federal Aid money available for New York at that time and that the only way to handle this matter was through a special act. It seems like that was the end of the Franklin D. Roosevelt Parkway proposal, as I didn't uncover anything beyond the end of 1945.

In my opinion, the Franklin D. Roosevelt Parkway would have made a great parkway in Dutchess County, New York. It certainly would have served a need for east-west traffic between Hyde Park and points east in the county, whether or not FDR had anything to do with it. The issues with connecting between Point A and Point B in Dutchess County were similar in Roosevelt's day as they are today. But the parkway may have forever altered the character of Hyde Park and the surrounding area, which is now mostly made of exurban homesteads, woods and farmland. Still, as a history buff, especially of Presidential history and transportation history, it was interesting to find out that Roosevelt tried to assist in solving a local transportation issue even while serving as President.

The FDR Home in Hyde Park.

A bust of FDR as found on the grounds of the FDR Home.

A couple of photos of country roads in the Hyde Park area. I believe this is on Dutchess County Route 41, which is also known as Crum Elbow Road and Netherwood Road.


Taconic State Parkway southbound at US 44. This is roughly where the Franklin D. Roosevelt Parkway would have intersected with the Taconic State Parkway.

A rough map created on https://www.scribblemaps.com/ that shows the proposed corridor of the Franklin D. Roosevelt Parkway.



Sources and Links:
National Parks Service History eLibrary (NPSHistory.com) - Franklin D. Roosevelt Parkway

Update Log:
January 3, 2021 - Added page to gribblenation.org.

Comments

SHAMGAR said…
As an old Friend and ART Dealer from WASH. DC used to Quip Whenever He came UP Here each Summer to Escape the City and Rusticate in N.W. CONN. > "The TACONIC is the TONIC ! "

Popular posts from this blog

Tulare Lake returns

During the winter of 2023 California experienced one of the wettest seasons in recent decades.  Enough snow and water were deposited into the Sierra Nevada Mountains that the runoff was enough to partially reform Tulare Lake within San Joaquin Valley.  Tulare Lake was once the largest lake west of the Mississippi River by surface area.  Tulare Lake has been largely dried for the past century due to irrigation divisions and upstream impoundments.  This blog will examine the history of Tulare Lake and its recent return.  Pictured as the blog cover is Tulare Lake from 19th Avenue in Kings County during early May 2023.  Tulare Lake can be seen near its maximum extent below on the 1876 P.Y. Baker Map of Tulare County .   Part 1; the history of Tulare Lake Tulare Lake is the largest remnant of Lake Corcoran.  Lake Corcoran once covered much of the entire Central Valley due to being it being located at a in natural low point from where mountain run-off would accumulate.  Lake Corcoran is thou

Former US Route 101 through Sargent

  Sargent is a ghost town and siding of the Southern Pacific Railroad located in southern Santa Clara County.  The original alignment of US Route 101 was aligned through Sargent via what is now known as Old Monterey Road.  Sargent was bypassed gradually due to shifts of the alignment of US Route 101 which occurred during 1941 and 1950.  Pictured as the blog cover is a view on Old Monterey Road which is now no longer accessible to the general public.  Below is a scan of the 1935 Division of Highways Map of Santa Clara County which depicts the original alignment US Route 101 through Sargent.   Part 1; the history of US Route 101 in Sargent Sargent lies on land which was once part of Rancho Juristac.  During 1856 James P. Sargent purchased Rancho Juristac and plotted what was known as Sargent Ranch.  By 1869 the Southern Pacific Railroad coast line reached the relocated town site of Gilroy.  The Southern Pacific Railroad coast line would be constructed through Chittenden Pass by 1871 whic

California State Route 60/Former US Route 60/70 through the Moreno Valley Badlands west to Riverside

This past month I drove California State Route 60 through the Moreno Valley Badlands westward towards the City of Riverside.  CA 60 through the Moreno Valley Badlands was once part of the corridors of US Route 60 and US Route 70. The present route of CA 60 is a 70 mile (76 counting multiplex) slice of former US 60 between downtown Los Angeles east to I-10 near Beaumont.  The vast majority of CA 60 aside from a small section in the Moreno Valley Badlands is presently a freeway grade. For me CA 60 holds some personal history as it was the route I used most frequently accessing work sites in the Inland Empire circa 2011-2013.  Despite what many others probably would say I always really enjoyed the Moreno Valley Badlands portion of CA 60.  Considering I frequently worked on US 60 through Arizona and New Mexico the route holds even more appeal.  I even have a CA 60 shield hanging up in my garage. Part 1; History of Roadways in the Moreno Valley Badlands CA 60 between B