Skip to main content

2016 Fall Mountain Trip Part 2; the Panamint Gap in California State Route 178

Picking up from where I left off in Part 1 I made my way up Trona Road to California State Route 178 east of Ridgecrest in northwest San Bernardino County.  Approaching Searles Valley there is a gap in CA 178 as the route was never built east through the Panamint Range.






Incidentally Part 1 of this series can be found here:

2016 Fall Mountain Trip Part 1; Garlock, CA ghost town


CA 178 as it was originally envisioned ran east from US 101 through to CA 7 in Mojave Desert.  The original iteration of CA 178 can be seen on this 1938 California State Highway Map, by 1938 CA 7 at the eastern terminus of CA 178 had become part of US Route 6.

1938 California State Highway Map 

By 1947 Legislative Route Number 212 was adopted which was a planned route from the eastern terminus of CA 178 across the Panamint Range to CA 127.  More information can be found on CAhighways.org regarding LRN 212.

CAhighways.org on LRN 212

On the 1948 State Highway Map LRN 212 can be seen running east from US 6 to Trona where a planned route is shown crossing the Panamint Range.  LRN 212 resumes in Death Valley and is shown continuing east of CA 127 to the Nevada State Line.

1948 California State Highway Map

By 1954 a new proposed alignment across the Panamint Range appears on the State Highway Map.

1954 California State Highway Map

By the 1964 State Highway Renumbering LRN 212 became part of CA 178.

1964 California State Highway Map

It is unlikely the gap in CA 178 over the Panamint Range will ever be complete.  Building a highway across the southern part of the Panamint Range would be costly and serve little in terms of moving traffic.  The defacto connection between the Panamint Gap in CA 178 is largely served by roads through Panamint Valley, CA 190 and Badwater Road in Death Valley National Park.  

Part 3 of this blog series can found here:

Part 3; Panamint Valley and Trona-Wildrose Road

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Paper Highways: The Unbuilt New Orleans Bypass (Proposed I-410)

  There are many examples around the United States of proposed freeway corridors in urban areas that never saw the light of day for one reason or another. They all fall somewhere in between the little-known and the infamous and from the mundane to the spectacular. One of the more obscure and interesting examples of such a project is the short-lived idea to construct a southern beltway for the New Orleans metropolitan area in the 1960s and 70s. Greater New Orleans and its surrounding area grew rapidly in the years after World War II, as suburban sprawl encroached on the historically rural downriver parishes around the city. In response to the development of the region’s Westbank and the emergence of communities in St. Charles and St. John the Baptist Parishes as viable suburban communities during this period, regional planners began to consider concepts for new infrastructure projects to serve this growing population.  The idea for a circular freeway around the southern perimeter of t

Hernando de Soto Bridge (Memphis, TN)

The newest of the bridges that span the lower Mississippi River at Memphis, the Hernando de Soto Bridge was completed in 1973 and carries Interstate 40 between downtown Memphis and West Memphis, AR. The bridge’s signature M-shaped superstructure makes it an instantly recognizable landmark in the city and one of the most visually unique bridges on the Mississippi River. As early as 1953, Memphis city planners recommended the construction of a second highway bridge across the Mississippi River to connect the city with West Memphis, AR. The Memphis & Arkansas Bridge had been completed only four years earlier a couple miles downriver from downtown, however it was expected that long-term growth in the metro area would warrant the construction of an additional bridge, the fourth crossing of the Mississippi River to be built at Memphis, in the not-too-distant future. Unlike the previous three Mississippi River bridges to be built the city, the location chosen for this bridge was about two

Memphis & Arkansas Bridge (Memphis, TN)

  Like the expansion of the railroads the previous century, the modernization of the country’s highway infrastructure in the early and mid 20th Century required the construction of new landmark bridges along the lower Mississippi River (and nation-wide for that matter) that would facilitate the expected growth in overall traffic demand in ensuing decades. While this new movement had been anticipated to some extent in the Memphis area with the design of the Harahan Bridge, neither it nor its neighbor the older Frisco Bridge were capable of accommodating the sharp rise in the popularity and demand of the automobile as a mode of cross-river transportation during the Great Depression. As was the case 30 years prior, the solution in the 1940s was to construct a new bridge in the same general location as its predecessors, only this time the bridge would be the first built exclusively for vehicle traffic. This bridge, the Memphis & Arkansas Bridge, was completed in 1949 and was the third