Skip to main content

Additional $5 million for I-73 fails to materialize

$5 million in annual dedicated funding for the construction of Interstate 73 was blocked by the South Carolina Senate last week. An amendment made by the House on a Senate procurement bill to add an additional $5 million for I-73 failed to make it out of committee.

Earlier this year, members of the South Carolina House had included a total of $6 million for I-73 in their version of the budget. On the other hand, the State Senate limited funding to $1 million. The highway will continue to receive $1 million annually from the state budget.

In the House's amendment, the additional $5 million would be placed in the state's Infrastructure Bank to be used exclusively for Interstate 73. The $5 million would be an annual contribution.

Members of the Senate disagreed with having the Infrastructure Bank being directed on which projects to fund. The bill would have called for the $5 million placed in the Infrastructure Bank to be used exclusively for I-73.

The South Carolina Infrastructure Bank is used to help fund large road projects. Monies from the bank have helped to construct large projects like the Conway Bypass, Carolina Bays Parkway, and the Ravenel Bridge.

State Senator Thomas Alexander R-Walhalla is a supporter of I-73 but couldn't go along with directing the Infrastructure Bank on what projects it would specifically fund.

"We might as well do away with the Infrastructure Bank if we do that," he said. "I just can't go along with it."

Story:
Attempt to get funds for I-73 dies in Senate ---Myrtle Beach Sun News

Commentary:
I can't disagree with Senate members who did not want to include this amendment on the basis of the legislature dictating to the Infrastructure Bank on what projects to fund. The Infrastructure Bank is to support projects throughout the entire state from the Upstate, to the Low Country, to the Grand Strand, and back to Columbia. The bank isn't set up just to fund I-73.

To get funding from the Infrastructure Bank, various projects must be presented to the bank's board of directors which award the money based on various criteria. The criteria include -- but are not limited to -- project need and procurement of additional funding sources.

Port expansion and access roads, badly needed highway widening, and new freeways are just some of the projects that apply and/or receive for Infrastructure Bank funds.

Adding money to the bank is fine, but legislating where that money is to be spent is a great disservice to the rest of the state. There are a lot of other projects throughout South Carolina that shouldn't be shoved to the back of the line just for Interstate 73.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Yes, the color of your nearby fire hydrant matters...

...and here's why. You will find White, Red, Yellow and Violet colored fire hydrants pretty much everywhere.  But there's a reason for this - and it's because of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA).  This association has issued guidelines for color coding standards for fire hydrants.  These color codes from the body of the hydrant, top of the hydrant, and in some municipalities the outlet caps are designed to allow fire fighters to know what type of system, water flow rate (Gallons Per Minute or GPM), and level of water pressure.  This guideline is known as NFPA 291 and is intended to be used universally throughout the United States. The NFPA guidelines are specific to the body and the top cap of the hydrant.  If a hydrant is WHITE or YELLOW - it means that it is connected to a public/municipal water system.  If a hydrant is RED - the hydrant is connected to a private system, typically a well.  These are most common in rural or unincorporated areas

Phase 1 of the California State Route 132 West Expressway (in the making since 1947)

On September 15, 2022, the Phase 1 of the California State Route 132 West Expressway opened in the city of Modesto from California State Route 99 west to North Dakota Avenue.  Phase 1 of the California State Route 132 West Expressway was built upon a corridor which was tentatively to designated to become the branching point for Interstate 5W in the 1947 concept of the Interstate Highway System.  The present California State Route 132 West Expressway corridor was adopted by the California Highway Commission on June 20, 1956.  Despite almost being rescinded during the 1970s the concept of the California State Route 132 West Expressway corridor lingered on for over half a century and became likely the oldest undeveloped right-of-way owned by California Transportation Commission.  Pictured above is the planned California State Route 132 freeway west of US Route 99 in Modesto as featured in the May/June 1962 California Highways & Public Works.   The history of the California State Route

Aptos Creek Road to the Loma Prieta ghost town site

Aptos Creek Road is a roadway in Santa Cruz County, California which connects the community of Aptos north to The Forest of Nisene Marks State Parks.  Aptos Creek Road north of Aptos is largely unpaved and is where the town site of Loma Prieta can be located.  Loma Prieta was a sawmill community which operated from 1883-1923 and reached a peak population of approximately three hundred.  Loma Prieta included a railroad which is now occupied by Aptos Creek Road along with a spur to Bridge Creek which now the Loma Prieta Grade Trail.  The site of the Loma Prieta Mill and company town burned in 1942.   Part 1; the history of Aptos Creek Road and the Loma Prieta town site Modern Aptos traces its origin to Mexican Rancho Aptos.  Rancho Aptos was granted by the Mexican Government in 1833 Rafael Castro.  Rancho Aptos took its name from Aptos Creek which coursed through from the Santa Cruz Mountains to Monterey Bay.  Castro initially used Rancho Aptos to raise cattle for their hides.  Following