Skip to main content

Stanislaus and San Joaquin County Route J6

By

County Route J6 is a 22.27-mile multi-county highway located Stanislaus County and San Joaquin County.  Said County Route begins at California State Route 108 in Stanislaus County along McHenry Avenue.  From California State Route 108 the highway continues into Escalon in San Joaquin County where it transitions to Escalon-Bellota Road.  The remaining balance of the County Route is carried by Escalon-Bellota Road to a terminus at California State Route 26. 

County Route J6 was commissioned in 1960 along with numerous other County Sign Routes in San Joaquin County.  The largely direct north/south corridor is mostly known for the strange County Route 6-7 shields which appear on Escalon-Bellota Road from California State Route 120 to Mariposa Road.  




The history of San Joaquin County Route J6 and scenes from the highway

Modern County Route J6 is comprised of 22.27 miles of McHenry Road and Escalon-Bellota Road.  The corridor originates at California State Route 108 in Stanislaus County but quickly enters San Joaquin County headed northbound.  County Route J6 passes through Escalon where it intersects California State Route 120 and County Route J7 at Yosemite Avenue.  County Routes J6 and J7 multiplex on Escalon-Bellota Road for approximately two miles north where the latter splits away onto Mariposa Road towards Stockton.  County Route J6 continues north on Escalon-Bellota Road to a terminus at California State Route 26.  

County Route J6 was commissioned during 1960 along with numerous other Sign County Routes in San Joaquin County.  The highway can be seen mapped below as it appears on cahighways.org. 


The northbound beginning of County Route J6 is in Stanislaus County near Modesto as California State Route 108 transitions from McHenry Avenue onto Patterson Avenue.  This intersection has not contained a J6 shield in over a decade.  McHenry Road is the fastest path of travel between Modesto and Escalon. 


County Route J6 upon crossing the Stanislaus River enters San Joaquin County and enters the city of Escalon.  Upon crossing the railroad tracks on McHenry Avenue, the highway intersects California State Route 120 and County Route J7.  None of the three highways are signed at the junction. 


County Routes J6 and J7 begin a multiplex on Escalon-Bellota Road north of California State Route 120.  Some of the highway signs oddly display both County Routes on one shield as "J6-7."


County Routes J6 and J7 intersect County Route J9 at Jack Tone Road.  


The multiplex of County Routes J6 and J7 ceases approximately two miles north of Escalon.  County Route J7 splits away towards Stockton via Mariposa Road.  


County Route J6 crosses the 1948-era Littlejohns Creek Bridge and intersects California State Route 4 in Farmington.  



County Route J6 continues north of Farmington and terminates at California State Route 26.  


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The case to move Interstate 73 in Southern Ohio onto US 33

By
Every decade or so, Ohio pushes to revisit the proposed Interstate 73 that would connect Michigan to Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.  It's been happening since Congress legislated the route in 1991.  Within Ohio, Interstate 73 generally follows the US 23 corridor from Portsmouth through Columbus to Toledo, and into Michigan. Since High Priority Corridor Five was created , Ohio has really done nothing to move forward with Interstate 73.  Sure, there have been feasibility studies here and there.  But actual dollars and construction just haven't occurred. The US 33 Nelsonville Bypass appears to have been built to Interstate standards. However, Ohio has been slowly upgrading US 33 to a full freeway through Southeastern Ohio.  Bypasses of Lancaster and Nelsonville opened in 2004 and 2013, respectively.  Other sections of two-lane road are being twinned, some to freeway or, at a minimum, to expressway standards.  Currently, a $274 million widening project in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Rep. Sue Myrick's letter to Gov. Easley and Sect. Tippett published in Charlotte Observer

By
US. Representative Sue Myrick's (R-Charlotte) letter to North Carolina's Governor Mike Easley and NC Transportation Secretary Lyndo Tippett was published in the Friday, November 30th edition of the Charlotte Observer . Why are we delaying the completion of 1-485 in Charlotte again? I read in The Charlotte Observer how rising prices of materials are leading to the delay. Why didn't these same rising costs delay the loops in Fayetteville and Wilmington? Why are we building loops in Fayetteville and Wilmington before we complete the one in Charlotte? We were working on the one in Charlotte back when I was mayor. That was 20 years ago! ... Last I looked Charlotte was the largest city in the state. There seems to be no recognition of that fact in Raleigh. No recognition that we are at a standstill with traffic. No recognition that we have a traffic problem. Nor is there any recognition of the fact that the state DOT utterly botched up the southern leg of our yet to be completed ...
Post a Comment
Read more

I-90 in Albany, New York and the Berkshire Spur

By
Today's Albany Times Union has a segment in their weekly Getting There? column that explains some of the history behind how I-90 is designated in the Albany, NY area as well as the Berkshire Spur. The long and short of the article was that I-90 was originally designated on the unsigned portion of the Berkshire Spur, but as free I-90 was built, the designation was moved onto the free portion of road. Additionally, there were talks in 1999 between state and federal officials about the possibility of moving I-90 back onto the unsigned portion of the Berkshire Spur, while extending I-88 onto what we know as free I-90. There would have also had been an I-88/I-90 multiplex between Rotterdam and Albany as a result. http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=916307
Post a Comment
Read more