Skip to main content

Arthur Laing Bridge in Metro Vancouver

By

The Arthur Laing Bridge is a 1,676-meter-long Cantilever span over the North Arm of the Fraser River which opened in 1975.  This structure connects the Marpole neighborhood in Vancouver directly to the main terminal at Vancouver International Airport.  Functionally the Arthur Laing Bridge was a replacement for the North Arm of the Marpole Bridge which had closed in 1957.




Part 1; the history of the Arthur Laing Bridge

The Arthur Laing Bridge spans the North Arm Fraser River between Sea Island (previously part of South Eburne) in the city of Richmond and Marpole neighborhood of Vancouver.  The current structure was proceeded by a portion of the Marpole Bridge.

Construction of the Marpole Bridge began in 1888 and was built by the San Francisco Bridge company.  The Marpole Bridge was designed as two timber truss spans which was connected via steel swing spans.  One part of the bridge crossed the Middle Arm Fraser River from Lulu Island (via Duck Island) whereas the other segment branched north over the North Arm to Marpole.  The completed bridge would open to traffic during December 1889 and was initially under the maintenance jurisdiction of the Municipality of Richmond.

The Marpole Bridge was plagued with issues shortly after it opened.  The South Eburne-Lulu Island span would be heavily damaged by ice sheets in 1890 which put it out of commission for much of the year.  The first documented collision with a ship came in 1891.  

In 1901 the Province of British Columbia took over maintenance of the Marpole Bridge.  The province would replace the existing planked structures with Howe Truss spans by 1902.  Despite improvements the Marpole Bridge would require extensive maintenance and upgrades due to the initial design quickly becoming outdated for the automotive era. 

The truss spans of the of the Marpole Bridge were replaced again during 1924-1925.  The Northern Fraser Arm span was officially classified as Eburne #4 and Middle Arm span as Eburne #5.  Both structures were surfaced with asphalt in 1934-1935.  The city of Vancouver had purchased plots of land on Sea Island in 1929 to construct an airport which brought additional automotive traffic. 

The Marpole Bridge can be seen in detail on the 1951 Shell Street map of Vancouver.  The North Arm of the bridge is shown connecting Airport Road to Marine Drive in the neighborhood of Marpole.  The Middle Arm is shown connecting Airport Road to River Road on Lulu Island.  

In 1951-1952 the North Arm truss of the Marpole Bridge was replaced.  This was followed by replacement of the Middle Arm truss in 1953.  


During 1955-1956 the North Arm of the Marpole Bridge was heavily damaged due to numerous barge strikes.  These strikes led to numerous closures and in one case required replacement of an entire support pier.  

During July 1957 the Moray Bridge would open as a replacement of for the Middle Arm of the Marpole Bridge.  Following the opening of the Moray Bridge the North Arm of the Marpole Bridge would be closed and later dismantled between 1958-1961.  This removal created an issue for traffic departing Vancouver for Vancouver International Airport as it now required a detour via Lulu Island.  The Middle Arm of the Marpole Bridge wouldn't be dismantled until 1965-1966.  

A replacement span for the North Arm of the Marpole Bridge was announced in 1963 by Arthur Laing, Minister of Northern Affairs & Natural Resources.  This span was proposed as a toll structure to be completed within three years.  Plans for the toll bridge fell through and by 1965 Laing was instead advocating for a tunnel under the North Arm Fraser River.  

In 1971 Don Jamison, Minister of Transport announced a toll-free replacement of for the North Arm Marpole Bridge would be constructed.  The announcement came with a stipulation that a ramp connecting the proposed structure to the Moray Bridge was not part of the project.  This omission was unpopular, but the structure would break ground as announced.  The then new span was named after Arthur Laing on September 6, 1974, and would open to traffic on August 27, 1975. 

The opening of the Arthur Laing Bridge was announced in the August 22, 1975, Daily Colonist.  The structure is owned and maintained by Vancouver International Airport. 




Part 2; visiting the Arthur Laing Bridge

Northbound Russ Baker Way on Sea Island approaches the Arthur Laing Bridge.  The right ramp directs traffic to the main terminal of Vancouver International Airport whereas the left ramp accesses Vancouver via the Arthur Laing Bridge.  Traffic wishing to access the Moray Bridge is required to turn left on the traffic light onto Miller Road. 



The Arthur Laing Bridge crosses over the North Arm Fraser River and approaches Marine Drive and Granville Street (British Columbia Highway 99) in the Marpole neighborhood in Vancouver.  The structure is 1,676 meters long and a Cantilever design. 








Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The case to move Interstate 73 in Southern Ohio onto US 33

By
Every decade or so, Ohio pushes to revisit the proposed Interstate 73 that would connect Michigan to Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.  It's been happening since Congress legislated the route in 1991.  Within Ohio, Interstate 73 generally follows the US 23 corridor from Portsmouth through Columbus to Toledo, and into Michigan. Since High Priority Corridor Five was created , Ohio has really done nothing to move forward with Interstate 73.  Sure, there have been feasibility studies here and there.  But actual dollars and construction just haven't occurred. The US 33 Nelsonville Bypass appears to have been built to Interstate standards. However, Ohio has been slowly upgrading US 33 to a full freeway through Southeastern Ohio.  Bypasses of Lancaster and Nelsonville opened in 2004 and 2013, respectively.  Other sections of two-lane road are being twinned, some to freeway or, at a minimum, to expressway standards.  Currently, a $274 million widening project in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Local Sign Find - The last remnant of Business Interstate 95 between Kenly and Rocky Mount , NC

By
As you head north on Interstate 95 at Exit 107 for Kenly and US 301, you'll notice something odd about the overhead sign for the exit.  Peeling off the sign for all that can see is the word 'NORTH' off-center from the US 301.  This old sign (probably close to original from when this section of I-95 opened - more on that in a little bit) gives a hint to a short-lived Business Interstate Route that ran from here to Rocky Mount. The last hint of the Kenly-Wilson-Rocky Mount Business I-95 (Shaun White - August 2020) Interstate 95 in North Carolina has a unique history.  But one of the overlooked and forgotten pieces of Interstate 95 in North Carolina is the 38 mile section between Kenly and Rocky Mount.  When opened to traffic in late 1978, it was the next to last piece of Interstate 95 in North Carolina to open replacing a four lane US 301 from Battleboro through Rocky Mount and Wilson to eventually tying back into the Interstate in Kenly. Though it was not delayed in l...
Post a Comment
Read more

SCDOT to present I-73 wetland replacement proposal on May 3rd

By
It looks like SCDOT may soon clear an environmental hurdle when they present a plan to replace 27 acres of wetlands on May 3rd. If approved, the plan will replace 27 acres of wetlands in the Little Pee Dee Heritage Preserve that will be impacted by construction of Interstate 73 through the area. Approval of the wetland replacement proposal is necessary for SCDOT to get federal permits that will allow them to build the new highway. The DOT and the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) are working together on the plan. Recently, the SC Legislature made two attempts to allow recent wetland gains by the state as compensation for the affected 27 acres. Both attempts failed. The DNR has stated it would not oppose I-73 even though some environmental-oriented groups have been vocal against it. The Southern Environmental Law Center , based in Chapel Hill, is one of the groups hoping that the routing through the preserve can still be changed. They point to federal law that prohibits buildi...
Post a Comment
Read more