Skip to main content

The planned Panhandle Freeway of San Francisco (Interstate 80)

By

The Panhandle Freeway was an approximately two-mile limited access corridor which was once proposed in the city of San Francisco.  The Panhandle Freeway conceptually would have connected US Route 101 at the Central Freeway west to the planned Interstate 280 freeway by way of Panhandle Park.  The concept of the Panhandle Freeway was added to the State Highway System as Legislative Route Number 223 during 1947.  The adopted alignment of the Panhandle Freeway corridor rescinded in 1955 and was never reestablished.  Between 1964-1968 the Panhandle Freeway was planned as Interstate 80 and later as the second iteration of California State Route 241 circa 1968-1972. 


The history of the planned Panhandle Freeway

The beginnings of the Panhandle Freeway and Central Freeway being added to the State Highway System came with the addition of LRN 223 by way of 1947 Legislative Chapter 11.  LRN 223 was defined as "a point on LRN 2 near Division Street to LRN 56." 

LRN 223 appears as a proposed highway for the first time on the 1948 Division of Highways Map.



The 1948 Transportation Plan for San Francisco included the concept for the Panhandle Freeway.  The Panhandle Freeway as originally conceived began at the Central Freeway.  The corridor was located through Panhandle Park between Haight Street and McAllister Street.  Upon reaching Golden Gate Park the Panhandle Freeway terminated and split into couplets.  The couplets are displayed as Richmond Freeway and Sunset Freeway.


The September/October 1953 California Highways & Public Works announced a leg of the Central Freeway was submitted as a recommended project during September 1954 California Highway Commission meeting.  The article notes the first Central Freeway segment was 0.9 miles long extending from 13th/Mission Street to vicinity of Turk Street.  The Central Freeway/Panhandle Freeway combined corridor is noted to be part of LRN 223 and LRN 2.  The article depicts the Bayshore Freeway designation as being planned to end at Mission Street.  The Panhandle Freeway is described as a 2.3-mile limited access corridor which would connect LRN 2 at the Central Freeway to LRN 56 (California State Route 1).  The purpose of the Panhandle Freeway was to act as a bypass for traffic more easily access the Golden Gate Bridge in addition to serving the neighborhoods of Richmond and Sunset.    





The 1954 Division of Highways Map depicts the newly completed segment of the Bayshore Freeway to Bryant Street in San Francisco.  Mainline US Route 101 is shown relocated from Potrero Avenue onto the new freeway segment to Bryant Street.  US Route 101 was carried to 10th Street via the Bryant Street ramp.  Part of LRN 223 is shown connecting the extending from the constructed part of the Bayshore Freeway west to Mission Street.  The Panhandle Freeway west to LRN 56 is shown with a more defined alignment following Lincoln Way. 


During 1955 the Panhandle Freeway corridor adoption was deleted from the San Francisco trafficways plan.  The corridor was noted to be "deleted, pending further study." 

The completed Bayshore Freeway, Central Freeway and San Francisco Skyline interchange was featured on the cover of the March/April 1955 California Highways & Public Works.  US Route 101 transitioned from the northern of the Bayshore Freeway onto the Central Freeway towards Mission Street.  The beginning of the San Francisco Skyline carried US Route 40 and US Route 50 towards the Bay Bridge.  It isn't fully clear when the Central Freeway designation was extended beyond Mission Street to the Bayshore Freeway/San Francisco Skyway junction. 


The July/August 1955 California Highways & Public Works noted the Central Freeway opened from the Bayshore Freeway to Mission Street on March 1, 1955.  The Bayshore Freeway is noted to have been opened from Alemany Boulevard to 3rd Street on March 30, 1955.  The San Francisco Skyway from the Bayshore Freeway to the Bay Bridge is noted to have opened on June 14, 1955.  






The 1956 Division of Highways Map displayed the completed Bayshore Freeway, Central Freeway and San Francisco Skyway interchange.  US Route 101 is shown to be realigned from the end of the Bayshore Freeway onto the Central Freeway and Mission Street towards Van Ness Avenue.  The Central Freeway is shown to be fully a component of LRN 2.  The Panhandle Freeway is shown reverted to a proposed highway with an undetermined routing. 


The Panhandle Freeway was rebranded as the "Western Freeway" in 1956.  Planners proposed an elevated iteration of the Western Freeway during said year which would branch from LRN 56 at 19th Avenue.  The elevated proposal was ultimately rejected by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in an 8-3 vote.  

The Division of Highways proposed a depressed iteration of the Western Freeway in 1960.  The corridor was again rejected by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in a 6-5 vote in 1962. 

As part of the 1964 State Highway Renumbering the Legislative Route Numbers were dropped in favor of Sign Route designations.  LRN 223 and the planned Western Freeway were consolidated into the legislative corridor of Interstate 80.  The Western Freeway corridor appears as planned Interstate 80 on the 1964 Division of Highways Map.  



The May/June 1964 California Highway & Public Works provided an update to the now rebranded "Panhandle Parkway" in San Francisco.  A public hearing was held on April 6, 1964, resulted in the city requesting a study alternative for a Crosstown Tunnel under Panhandle Park.  



The May/June 1965 California Highways & Public Works provided an update regarding the status of the Panhandle Parkway.  The latest corridor presented by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors had been rejected during October 1964 by a 6-5 vote.  The Board of Supervisors fully objected to the prospect of constructing the corridor through the proposed Crosstown Tunnel.  Following the rejection the California Highway Commission decided against adopting an alignment.


The San Francisco Board of Supervisors voted against the Panhandle Parkway 6-5 for a final time on March 21, 1966.  1968 Legislative Chapter 282 transferred the planned Panhandle Parkway from Interstate 80 to the second iteration of California State Route 241.  The corridor appears as planned California State Route 241 on the 1969 Division of Highways Map.  



1972 Legislative Chapter 1216 deleted California State Route 241 and by proxy the planned Panhandle Parkway.  The corridor does not appear on the 1975 Caltrans Map.  


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The case to move Interstate 73 in Southern Ohio onto US 33

By
Every decade or so, Ohio pushes to revisit the proposed Interstate 73 that would connect Michigan to Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.  It's been happening since Congress legislated the route in 1991.  Within Ohio, Interstate 73 generally follows the US 23 corridor from Portsmouth through Columbus to Toledo, and into Michigan. Since High Priority Corridor Five was created , Ohio has really done nothing to move forward with Interstate 73.  Sure, there have been feasibility studies here and there.  But actual dollars and construction just haven't occurred. The US 33 Nelsonville Bypass appears to have been built to Interstate standards. However, Ohio has been slowly upgrading US 33 to a full freeway through Southeastern Ohio.  Bypasses of Lancaster and Nelsonville opened in 2004 and 2013, respectively.  Other sections of two-lane road are being twinned, some to freeway or, at a minimum, to expressway standards.  Currently, a $274 million widening project in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Local Sign Find - The last remnant of Business Interstate 95 between Kenly and Rocky Mount , NC

By
As you head north on Interstate 95 at Exit 107 for Kenly and US 301, you'll notice something odd about the overhead sign for the exit.  Peeling off the sign for all that can see is the word 'NORTH' off-center from the US 301.  This old sign (probably close to original from when this section of I-95 opened - more on that in a little bit) gives a hint to a short-lived Business Interstate Route that ran from here to Rocky Mount. The last hint of the Kenly-Wilson-Rocky Mount Business I-95 (Shaun White - August 2020) Interstate 95 in North Carolina has a unique history.  But one of the overlooked and forgotten pieces of Interstate 95 in North Carolina is the 38 mile section between Kenly and Rocky Mount.  When opened to traffic in late 1978, it was the next to last piece of Interstate 95 in North Carolina to open replacing a four lane US 301 from Battleboro through Rocky Mount and Wilson to eventually tying back into the Interstate in Kenly. Though it was not delayed in l...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mormon Emigrant Trail (Emergency US Route 50 Alternate)

By
Mormon Emigrant Trail is an approximately 24.5-mile portion of the original routing of the Carson Pass Highway in Eldorado National Forest.  Mormon Emigrant Trail begins at California State Route 88 near Alder Hill and extends westward to Eldorado County Route J16 at Sly Park Road.   Carson Pass was a known crossing of the Sierra Nevada by the Washoe and was surveyed in an 1844 expedition led by John C. Fremont.  The Carson Pass Highway was plotted as a wagon road by the Mormon Battalion in 1848 and was once the primary crossing of the Sierra Nevada.  By the 1880s the Carson Pass Highway had several spurs with the primary traffic corridor being rerouted to Jackson.  The original routing towards Placerville would come to be known as Morman Emigrant Trail and became part of Eldorado National Forest in 1910.  Morman Emigrant Trail is part of Forest Road 10N50 and Eldorado National Forest Route 5.  Despite being a seasonally maintained roadway corrido...
1 comment
Read more