Skip to main content

Former California State Route 180 on Dunlap Road


When California State Route 180 was commissioned in August 1934 the alignment in took in Sierra Nevada range was very different than from today.  The original highway alignment from Squaw Valley (now Yokuts Valley) to east Grant Grove (then part of General Grant National Park) originally followed what is now Ruth Hill Road, Dunlap Road, Pinehurst Road (modern California State Route 245), Dark Canyon Road (partially now Forest Road 14S45).  After funding fell through for the planned Kings Canyon Road the was corridor eventually picked up as a 30-mile-long cooperative project between the Division of Highways and Federal Government.  The current alignment of California State Route 180 bypassing Squaw Valley and Dunlap was complete by 1941. 

Ruth Hill Road has carried numerous names through the years.  The corridor often appears on older maps as Old Dunlap Road or the Squaw Valley Grade.  The corridor is named after the approximately 2,600-foot-high Ruth Hill.  

Modern Ruth Hill Road is entirely paved but has numerous single lane grades which approach an incline of 10%.  The Ruth Hill corridor coupled with nearby Dunlap Road act as good analogs for what early State Highways in the western Sierra Nevada were once like.  California State Route 180 along Dunlap Road between Dunlap and Miramonte can be seen as the cover photo as it was featured in the November 1938 California Highways & Public Works. 




Part 1; the history of early California State Route 180 along Dunlap Road

During 1905 Legislative Chapter 598 would authorize a survey to locate a route for a highway to be constructed from Grant Grove of General Grant National Park into the Kings River Canyon.  This corridor would be formally added as a planned state highway by way of 1909 Legislative Chapter 223 as Legislative Route Number 41.  

Planned Legislative Route Number 41 appears on the 1918 California Highway Commission map as a special appropriations road.  



The 1919 Third State Highway Bond Act would provide funding for construction of the Kings River Canyon Road.  In 1933 Legislative Route Number 41 would be extended to Tracy via Fresno.  The state highway west of Grant Grove followed Dark Canyon Road (now partially Forest Road 14S45), Pinehurst Road (now California State Route 245) Dunlap Road, and Old Dunlap Road (now Ruth Hill Road) through to Centerville.  The initial Grant Grove-Centerville alignment of Legislative Route Number 41 passes through the communities of Pinehurst, Miramonte, Dunlap and Squaw Valley (now Yokuts Valley).  

Legislative Route Number 41 east of Fresno would be assigned as California State Route 180 when the initial Sign State Routes were announced in the August 1934 California Highways & Public Works.


The initial alignment of California State Route 180 east of Fresno can be seen on the 1935 Division of Highways map of Fresno County (unbroken red line).  The state highway corridor is shown following what is now Ruth Hill Road through Squaw Valley into Dunlap.  From Dunlap the State Highway corridor is seen continuing on Dunlap Road towards Miramonte and Pinehurst.  



A planned new alignment of California State Route 180 from Boulder Creek east to the Sequoia National Forest boundary near Dunlap appears budgeted for the 89th-90th Fiscal Years in the January 1937 California Highways & Public Works.  The project corridor is shown to be broken up into zones spanning a total of 11 miles.  


California State Route 180 along the slopes of Ruth Hill appears on the cover of the November 1938 California Highways & Public Works.  The cover caption notes construction of the planned new alignment was shelved due to funding falling short.  The existing corridor is called the "Squaw Valley Grade" in the caption.  



The realignment of California State Route 180 from the outskirts of Squaw Valley to Grant Grove appears as budgeted 30-mile project zone for the 91st-92nd Fiscal Years in the February 1939 California Highways & Public Works.  


The Squaw Valley-Grant Grove realignment of California State Route 180 was featured in the June 1940 California Highways & Public Works as being a cooperative project between the Federal Government and State of California.  The chosen alignment is noted to first have been first surveyed by the Federal Government in 1931 to provide better access to General Grant National Park.  The existing highway is noted to be extremely winding and have grades in excess of 10%.  General Grant National Park was reorganized and in expanded during 1940 into Kings Canyon National Park.  




The November 1941 California Highways & Public Works details the opening of the new alignment of California State Route 180 bypassing Squaw Valley and Dunlap.  The then new highway is referenced in the article as "Kings Canyon Road" and is noted to have been completed on August 28, 1941.  This is the first known instance of Kings Canyon Road nomenclature being used.  The name is still used for much of California State Route 180 east of downtown Fresno in modern times. 







Part 2; a drive on the original alignment of California State Route 180 along Dunlap Road

Westbound Dunlap Road begins at California State Route 245 near Pinehurst.  This would have been the original terminus of California State Route 65 following California State Route 180 being moved to a bypass of Dunlap in 1941.  California State Route 65 for a time was extended through Dark Canyon Road towards Grant Grove.  Miramonte is noted as being 3 miles to the west whereas Dunlap is noted to be 9 miles away.   


Westbound Dunlap Road crosses Mill Creek and enters the small community of Miramonte.  Miramonte was founded in the 1890s as a mill community which took advantage of the then booming lumber business out of nearby Converse Basin.  The community had Postal Service originally from 1909 through 1912.  The service resumed in 1923 and has remained active to modern times.  
















Dunlap Road west of Miramonte runs alongside Mill Creek into Dunlap Canyon.  The first significant intersection can be found at Sand Creek Road.
















Westbound Dunlap Road crosses Mill Creek and intersects Millwood Road at the outskirts of Dunlap.  Dunlap was plotted as a stage stop on the road to Millwood and Converse Basin the 1880s.  The community obtained Postal Service in 1882 and is named after local schoolteacher George Dunlap Moss. 










Dunlap Road intersects Ruth Hill Road in the center of Dunlap.  Ruth Hill Road originally carried California State Route 180 west through Squaw Valley. 



Modern Dunlap Road continued west to a terminus at California State Route 180.






Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The case to move Interstate 73 in Southern Ohio onto US 33

Every decade or so, Ohio pushes to revisit the proposed Interstate 73 that would connect Michigan to Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.  It's been happening since Congress legislated the route in 1991.  Within Ohio, Interstate 73 generally follows the US 23 corridor from Portsmouth through Columbus to Toledo, and into Michigan. Since High Priority Corridor Five was created , Ohio has really done nothing to move forward with Interstate 73.  Sure, there have been feasibility studies here and there.  But actual dollars and construction just haven't occurred. The US 33 Nelsonville Bypass appears to have been built to Interstate standards. However, Ohio has been slowly upgrading US 33 to a full freeway through Southeastern Ohio.  Bypasses of Lancaster and Nelsonville opened in 2004 and 2013, respectively.  Other sections of two-lane road are being twinned, some to freeway or, at a minimum, to expressway standards.  Currently, a $274 million widening project in...

Rep. Sue Myrick's letter to Gov. Easley and Sect. Tippett published in Charlotte Observer

US. Representative Sue Myrick's (R-Charlotte) letter to North Carolina's Governor Mike Easley and NC Transportation Secretary Lyndo Tippett was published in the Friday, November 30th edition of the Charlotte Observer . Why are we delaying the completion of 1-485 in Charlotte again? I read in The Charlotte Observer how rising prices of materials are leading to the delay. Why didn't these same rising costs delay the loops in Fayetteville and Wilmington? Why are we building loops in Fayetteville and Wilmington before we complete the one in Charlotte? We were working on the one in Charlotte back when I was mayor. That was 20 years ago! ... Last I looked Charlotte was the largest city in the state. There seems to be no recognition of that fact in Raleigh. No recognition that we are at a standstill with traffic. No recognition that we have a traffic problem. Nor is there any recognition of the fact that the state DOT utterly botched up the southern leg of our yet to be completed ...

I-90 in Albany, New York and the Berkshire Spur

Today's Albany Times Union has a segment in their weekly Getting There? column that explains some of the history behind how I-90 is designated in the Albany, NY area as well as the Berkshire Spur. The long and short of the article was that I-90 was originally designated on the unsigned portion of the Berkshire Spur, but as free I-90 was built, the designation was moved onto the free portion of road. Additionally, there were talks in 1999 between state and federal officials about the possibility of moving I-90 back onto the unsigned portion of the Berkshire Spur, while extending I-88 onto what we know as free I-90. There would have also had been an I-88/I-90 multiplex between Rotterdam and Albany as a result. http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=916307