Skip to main content

Arizona State Route 24

By


Arizona State Route 24 is a partially completed freeway in southeastern Maricopa County.  As presently constructed Arizona State Route 24 begins at Arizona State Route 202 near Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport and terminates 5.48 miles to the east at Ironwood Drive.  Arizona State Route 24 is known as the Gateway Freeway and is planned to eventually continue into Pinal County.  The first mile of Arizona State Route 24 between Arizona State Route 202 and Ellsworth Road opened to traffic on May 4, 2014.  The interim Phase II extension of Arizona State Route 24 east to Ironwood Drive opened to traffic on August 11, 2022.  




Part 1; the history of Arizona State Route 24

The origin of Arizona State Route 24 dates to September 2003 when a Final Report on the Southeast Maricopa/Northern Pinal County Transportation Study was released.  The Final Report was prepared by the Maricopa Association of Governments, Central Arizona Association of Governments and Arizona Department of Transportation.  The Final Report identified the future corridor Arizona State Route 24 as being necessary due to the outward suburban sprawl of eastern Maricopa County into Pinal County.  






During March 2006 the Maricopa Association of Governments released a Final Report regarding the preferred corridor of what was then numbered as Arizona State Route 802.  The final report identified the preferred corridor of Arizona State Route 802 as beginning near Phoenix-Gateway Gateway Airport traveling southeast.  The preferred corridor of Arizona State Route 802 turned east at Frye Road towards the Pinal County line.  

During 2009 the Maricopa Association of Governments altered Regional Transportation Plan due to the ongoing recession.  Maricopa County funding of Arizona State Route 802 was subsequently pulled back to 2026 or later between Ellsworth Road and Meridian Road.  An interim freeway between Arizona State Route 202 (the San Tan Freeway) and Ellsworth Road was to be constructed during the 2016-2020 timeframe. 

During 2011 the city of Mesa fronted $148 million to funding construction of the first mile of the new freeway between Arizona State Route 202 and Ellsworth Road.  The so-called "Gateway Freeway" was announced as being renumbered as Arizona State Route 24 by AZcentral on June 6, 2011.  The first mile of Arizona State Route 24 from Arizona State Route 202 to Ellsworth Road opened to traffic on May 4, 2014. 

The interim eastern extension of Arizona State Route 24 from Ellsworth Road to Ironwood Road fully opened to traffic on August 11, 2022.  The interim Phase II extension included two general purpose lanes in each travel direction but not the interchanges east of Ellsworth Road.  The interim Phase II alignment of Arizona State Route 24 utilizes what will be the on/off ramps at Williams Field Road, Signal Butte Road, Moeur Road and Ironwood Road. 

The nearly complete interim Phase II alignment of Arizona State Route 24 was featured by the Arizona Department of Transportation on August 1, 2022.  




To date no preferred corridor for an extension of Arizona State Route 24 has been selected in Pinal County.  The study to determine a routing in Pinal County has been suspended to allow for it to advance in conjunction with the with the Pinal North-South Freeway.  Planning maps from a December 2009 Arizona Department of Transportation Environmental Assessment depict the general corridor of the Gateway Freeway continuing east to Florence Junction near the intersection of US Route 60 and Arizona State Route 79. 




Part 2; a flyover of Arizona State Route 24

Below the interchange between Arizona State Route 202 and Arizona State Route 24 can be seen north of Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport.  


The below photo depicts the full interchange on Arizona State Route 24 at Ellsworth Road and interim at-grade intersection at Williams Field Road.  


The below photo depicts the interim intersections on Arizona State Route 24 at Williams Field Road, Signal Butte Road, Moeur Road and Ironwood Drive.  

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The case to move Interstate 73 in Southern Ohio onto US 33

By
Every decade or so, Ohio pushes to revisit the proposed Interstate 73 that would connect Michigan to Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.  It's been happening since Congress legislated the route in 1991.  Within Ohio, Interstate 73 generally follows the US 23 corridor from Portsmouth through Columbus to Toledo, and into Michigan. Since High Priority Corridor Five was created , Ohio has really done nothing to move forward with Interstate 73.  Sure, there have been feasibility studies here and there.  But actual dollars and construction just haven't occurred. The US 33 Nelsonville Bypass appears to have been built to Interstate standards. However, Ohio has been slowly upgrading US 33 to a full freeway through Southeastern Ohio.  Bypasses of Lancaster and Nelsonville opened in 2004 and 2013, respectively.  Other sections of two-lane road are being twinned, some to freeway or, at a minimum, to expressway standards.  Currently, a $274 million widening project in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Rep. Sue Myrick's letter to Gov. Easley and Sect. Tippett published in Charlotte Observer

By
US. Representative Sue Myrick's (R-Charlotte) letter to North Carolina's Governor Mike Easley and NC Transportation Secretary Lyndo Tippett was published in the Friday, November 30th edition of the Charlotte Observer . Why are we delaying the completion of 1-485 in Charlotte again? I read in The Charlotte Observer how rising prices of materials are leading to the delay. Why didn't these same rising costs delay the loops in Fayetteville and Wilmington? Why are we building loops in Fayetteville and Wilmington before we complete the one in Charlotte? We were working on the one in Charlotte back when I was mayor. That was 20 years ago! ... Last I looked Charlotte was the largest city in the state. There seems to be no recognition of that fact in Raleigh. No recognition that we are at a standstill with traffic. No recognition that we have a traffic problem. Nor is there any recognition of the fact that the state DOT utterly botched up the southern leg of our yet to be completed ...
Post a Comment
Read more

I-90 in Albany, New York and the Berkshire Spur

By
Today's Albany Times Union has a segment in their weekly Getting There? column that explains some of the history behind how I-90 is designated in the Albany, NY area as well as the Berkshire Spur. The long and short of the article was that I-90 was originally designated on the unsigned portion of the Berkshire Spur, but as free I-90 was built, the designation was moved onto the free portion of road. Additionally, there were talks in 1999 between state and federal officials about the possibility of moving I-90 back onto the unsigned portion of the Berkshire Spur, while extending I-88 onto what we know as free I-90. There would have also had been an I-88/I-90 multiplex between Rotterdam and Albany as a result. http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=916307
Post a Comment
Read more