Skip to main content

I-93 Sign Replacement Project Update

Decided to beat the Memorial Day rush and traveled up I-93 north of Boston Wednesday afternoon to check out the progress of the two sign replacement projects. Based on webcam images, I new some signs had been replaced at the southern and northern end of the Somerville to Exit 38 segment. Turns out signage has been updated northbound for Exit 28 (MA 28/38), the first sign for Exit 31 (MA 16) (I guess taking advantage of MassDOT closing I-93 between Exits 20 and 28 for Big Dig Tunnel maintenance a couple nights a month) and for Exits 34 to 38. A photographic summary starts with the first re-signed exit:
This is the second overhead assembly. The signs are mounted on the previously existing overhead supports that go back to the opening of the lower and upper deck portions of I-93 in the early 1970's. I don't know about using the left hand side simply for an auxiliary sign for the exit, but there isn't much room to place it elsewhere.

The next interchange that  has had all of its signs updated northbound is Exit 34, MA 28:
This is the second MA 28 exit in a row, and the third involving the route in the last 6 exits. The new signage at the exit ramp itself :
You'll notice that while the signage has been updated, work could be done to improve the painted surfaces of the bridge beyond. 

The next exit is for Montvale Avenue:

The orange barrels beyond were for the construction crews. They were working in the median over the hill, do not know if it was sign related or not.

Before Montvale Ave. you get the first notice of the upcoming I-95 interchange:
Unlike at the southern I-93/I-95 interchange there are no fancy diagrammatic signs. Given the current cloverleaf design, they are not allowed under MUTCD. Maybe they will appear if the interchange is revised with flyover ramps as MassDOT has proposed. Here's a closeup of the I-93 sign in the distance:
The size of the shield is standard issue for MassDOT, though ironically the new I-95/MA 128 reassurance markers put up for that sign project are both on one post.

The next new sign for Montvale Ave. was obscured by the older overhead assembly that had not been taken down as of yet. Approaching within a mile of the I-95 exit:
Notice the large auxiliary MA 128 sign. MassDOT sign standards specifically prohibit any '128' shield from accompanying I-95 on highway and approaching highway signage between Canton and Peabody. Only one of the signs approaching the interchange had been put up:

The older sign in the distance was removed a day after this photo was taken. It is interesting that there is only one local control city on the new sign. Other signs along I-95 to the south typically use Portsmouth NH alone or with a local destination. Apparently the FHWA has agreed to letting MassDOT use local cities here. You would think there would be some benefit to having a sign indicating you can take I-95 to access coastal NH or Maine. Perhaps they think all long distance traffic on this part of I-93 originates from the Boston area and those people would take US 1 or know I-95 gets off of 128 in Peabody.

Beyond I-95 there are two more revised signage exits:
The destinations on these exit signs have expanded beyond the original Commerce Way, with RTC for Regional Transportation Center. Also hope some day this will not be a suffixed exit with the introduction of mile-based exit numbering (more below). The last exit with new signage is that for MA 129:
This is the last interchange under the southern replacement contract. To the north there were new foundations placed for the new overhead signs, but nothing more. Turning around to head southbound at Exit 39, I was able to take a picture of the typical MGS or Mass. Guide (or Green) Sign at I-93 on-ramps:
Apparently MassDOT believes Boston is the only destination travelers need to know.

Heading back toward Boston, southbound signs have been replaced from Exits 38 to (the first two for) 35. Starting out beyond Exit 39:
Notice the Deer Crossing sign. If MassDOT was reflecting the reality of the high deer population they would probably have to place on after nearly every exit nowadays.

Heading further south approaching Exit 38:
Again the signs look great, but maybe a little repainting of the bridge would be nice. The second overhead assembly for MA 129 introduces I-95 into the mix:
Again I-95 features local control cities, other signs along I-95 to the south have Providence, RI alone or with another local city. Maybe they do not to encourage more traffic along the '128' Belt? Notice the orange contractor tag and barrel have not been removed, perhaps more work needed.

At the 1 Mile mark to I-95:
You again have the auxiliary sign for MA 128 off to the right. These signs next appear at the interchange itself:
Just a part of one made it at this photo approaching the I-95 South off-ramp. There was not one for the northbound ramp (they are at both ramps heading northbound). The next exit is Montvale Avenue:
The Series 'E' or Service signs were replaced last year. Does having those replace first indicate the priorities of MassDOT or does it take more effort to plan placing the overheads?

Here's another new I-93 shield:
Next to an older Distance sign. I do not know whether these distances are correct, many of the signs put up several years ago had to be corrected because of wrong numbers.

The last exit with new signage is Exit 35:
'Park St.' Stoneham/Melrose is a new designation for this exit, the previous sign listing 'Winchester Highlands.' Direct access to this destination, no longer exists, so MassDOT changed it to Stoneham and Melrose as destinations and added Park Street to help differentiate this exit from other Stoneham exits for drivers.

While there were no more new on road signage along this direction until Somerville, they have replaced some of the overhead ramp signage, such as at Exit 33:
Notice the 'control cities' feature a street name. The street is 'Fellsway West' but might this be confusing to drivers seeing North/West on one sign and South/West on another, thinking it should be 'East'? The next signs are less confusing:
The work on the right is replacing the guardrails at the interchange, part of a project putting up sound barrier walls along this stretch of I-93 (seen in the background).

This last photo is the signage at the Leverett Connector exit:
This signage was put up as well, again taking advantage of I-93 Big Dig Tunnel closures, the lower text for Exit 28 is new, with the addition of Assembly Square, a new development going in at the site of an old mall. The Exit 26 signage was relatively new, but the new sign is larger and taller. I also like having part of the Boston skyline in the background. (MA 3 should be US 3 here, if it was up to me).

I always thought that sign update projects like this would be a good time for MassDOT to change to mile-based exit numbering from (somewhat) consecutive exit numbers. Since that has not happened, I thought I'd post what the exit numbers should be for the exits in the southern sign replacement project area:

Northbound:
Exit                            Current Number                  Milepost*           Mile Based Number
MA 28/38                          29                                      20.4                          20
MA 16                               31                                      22.1                         22
MA 60 Medford Sq.           32                                      22.5                          23A
MA 28 Fellsway W.           33                                      23.2                          23B
MA 28 Stoneham              34                                      25.3                          25
Montvale Ave.                    36                                      26.9                          27
I-95/MA 128                       37                                      28.4                          28
Commerce Way                37C                                    29.9                          30
MA 129                             38                                      31.1                          31

Southbound:
Exit                            Current Number                 Milepost*           Mile Based Number
MA 129                            38                                      31.1                          31
Commerce Way               37C                                    29.9                          30
I-95/MA 128                      37                                      28.4                          28
Montvale Ave.                   36                                      26.9                          27
Park St.                            35                                      26.0                          26
MA 28 Stoneham              34                                      25.3                          25 
MA 28 Fellsway W.           33                                      23.2                          23B
MA 60 Medford Sq.           32                                     22.5                          23A 
MA 16                              31                                     22.1                          22  
MA 28/38                         30                                      20.4                          20B
Sullivan Square                28                                      20.1                          20A

*Milepost figures downloaded from Mass Exec. Office of Transportation, 2007 Interchange Table 

Comments

Anonymous said…
Nice stuff and a lot of it there, thanks for posting! Glad they got all those signs done before Clearview uglybug bit. - David S.
Custom Sign said…
The first impression is the last impression. It is always the first impression of your business that one makes on a guest that goes far to decide whether you’ll change over them to dedicated clients. One of the best ways to establish that first impression is through Custom Sign that your business uses for branding or advertising and promotional goals.

Popular posts from this blog

The original alignment of California State Route 1 in San Francisco

In 2019 the Gribblenation Blog Series covered the history of the Hyde Street Pier and the original surface alignment of US Route 101 in San Francisco.  Given the Golden Gate Bridge opened to traffic in May of 1937 coupled with the fact that the Sign State Routes had been announced in August of 1934 there were still some open questions regarding the original highway alignments in San Francisco.  Namely the question of this blog is; where was California State Route 1 prior to the completion of the Golden Gate Bridge?  Thanks the to the discovery of a 1936 Shell Highway Map of San Francisco and the California Highways & Public Works the answer can be conveyed clearly.     Part 1; the history of early California State Route 1 in San Francisco The genesis point for California State Route 1 ("CA 1") in San Francisco dates to 1933.  1933 was significant due to the State Legislature allowing the Division of Highways to assume maintenance of highways in Cities for the first time. 

Santa Clara County Route G8 and the New Almaden Quicksilver Mine

Santa Clara County Route G8 is a 29.38 mile County Sign Route which is part of the San Francisco Bay Area transportation corridor.  Santa Clara County Route G8 begins at California State Route 152 near the outskirts of Gilroy and terminates at former US Route 101 at 1st Street/Monterey Road near downtown San Jose.  Santa Clara County Route G8 incorporates the notable Almaden Expressway and is historically tied to the New Almaden Quicksilver Mine.   (Santa Clara County Route G8 map image courtesy CAhighways.org) Part 1; the history of Santa Clara County Route G8, the Almaden Road corridor and New Almaden Mine The present corridor of Santa Clara County Route G8 ("G8") began to take shape with the emergence of the Almaden Expressway.  According to the October 1960 California Highways & Public Works Unit 1 of the Almaden Expressway opened in November of 1959 between Alma Avenue near downtown San Jose south to the Guadalupe River as part of a Federal Highway Aid Secondary pro

California State Route 1 the Shoreline Highway Part 3; a drive through Mendocino County

This blog is Part 3 of a three part series on of the Shoreline Highway segment of California State Route 1 and features a drive through Mendocino County.  Part 2 found below features a drive through Marin County.  California State Route 1 the Shoreline Highway Part 2; a drive through Sonoma County Chapter 4; California State Route 1/Shoreline Highway through Mendocino County Upon crossing the Gualala River and entering Mendocino County CA 1 northbound traverses into Gualala at Postmile MEN 1.2. The land which the community of Gualala now sits was part of a 1844 Mexican Land Grant to General Rafael Garcia between the Gualala River and Mal Paso Creek.  After the Mexican-American War the State of California invalidated Garcia's Land Grant which was made it available to homesteaders.  In 1861 Cyrus Robinson filed a claim under the provisions of the 1820 Land Act on land upon which the community of Gualala now sits.  Soon a saloon, hotel and ferry would develop which formed the basis of