Skip to main content

Klamath Tour Thru Tree

By

The Klamath Tour Thru Tree is a Coastal Redwood tunnel tree located off California State Route 169 in Klamath Glen.  This particular tree is 167.54 feet high which makes it far smaller than the more famous Chandlier Tree in Leggett.  The Klamath Tour Thru Tree was carved during May 1976 which allows it to facilitate passage by larger vehicles than the Chandlier Tree.  The Klamath Tour Thru Tree is one of the most popular tourism spots in Del Norte County and draws approximately 60,000 vehicles annually.




Part 1; the history of the Klamath Tour Thru Tree

The Klamath Tour Thru Tree is located off of California State Route 169 near the interchange with US Route 101 in Klamath Glen.  The tree is a 167.54 foot high Coastal Redwood which was part of a grove spared when the area around Klamath Glen was logged in 1967.  The Klamath Tour Thru Tree is thought to be approximately 750 years old. 

In May 1976 retired Air Force Major and Del Notre County Supervisor Harold A. Del Ponte hired two of his nephews to carve a tunnel into what became the Klamath Tour Thru Tree.  The tunnel was 7.33 feet wide by 9.50 feet high which made it large enough to accommodate most modern automobiles.  

Del Ponte offered his nephews $600 in cash each or half the annual proceeds of Klamath Tour Thru Tree.  The nephews took the cash offer given they did not see the tunnel becoming a major attraction like the Chandlier Tree to the south in Leggett.  The Klamath Tour Thru Tree became a success nonetheless and sees approximately 60,000 visitors annually which made it one of the most popular tourist destinations in Del Norte County. 



Part 2; a visit to the Klamath Tour Thru Tree

At Post Mile DN R0.175 eastbound California State Route 169 passes by the entrance to Klamath Tour Thru Tree park.  


The Klamath Tour Thru Tree can accommodate larger vehicles than the Chandlier Tree, especially in those which are taller.  The approach drive is also paved which makes the attraction more reliable open to all-weather conditions throughout the year.  




Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The case to move Interstate 73 in Southern Ohio onto US 33

By
Every decade or so, Ohio pushes to revisit the proposed Interstate 73 that would connect Michigan to Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.  It's been happening since Congress legislated the route in 1991.  Within Ohio, Interstate 73 generally follows the US 23 corridor from Portsmouth through Columbus to Toledo, and into Michigan. Since High Priority Corridor Five was created , Ohio has really done nothing to move forward with Interstate 73.  Sure, there have been feasibility studies here and there.  But actual dollars and construction just haven't occurred. The US 33 Nelsonville Bypass appears to have been built to Interstate standards. However, Ohio has been slowly upgrading US 33 to a full freeway through Southeastern Ohio.  Bypasses of Lancaster and Nelsonville opened in 2004 and 2013, respectively.  Other sections of two-lane road are being twinned, some to freeway or, at a minimum, to expressway standards.  Currently, a $274 million widening project in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Rep. Sue Myrick's letter to Gov. Easley and Sect. Tippett published in Charlotte Observer

By
US. Representative Sue Myrick's (R-Charlotte) letter to North Carolina's Governor Mike Easley and NC Transportation Secretary Lyndo Tippett was published in the Friday, November 30th edition of the Charlotte Observer . Why are we delaying the completion of 1-485 in Charlotte again? I read in The Charlotte Observer how rising prices of materials are leading to the delay. Why didn't these same rising costs delay the loops in Fayetteville and Wilmington? Why are we building loops in Fayetteville and Wilmington before we complete the one in Charlotte? We were working on the one in Charlotte back when I was mayor. That was 20 years ago! ... Last I looked Charlotte was the largest city in the state. There seems to be no recognition of that fact in Raleigh. No recognition that we are at a standstill with traffic. No recognition that we have a traffic problem. Nor is there any recognition of the fact that the state DOT utterly botched up the southern leg of our yet to be completed ...
Post a Comment
Read more

I-90 in Albany, New York and the Berkshire Spur

By
Today's Albany Times Union has a segment in their weekly Getting There? column that explains some of the history behind how I-90 is designated in the Albany, NY area as well as the Berkshire Spur. The long and short of the article was that I-90 was originally designated on the unsigned portion of the Berkshire Spur, but as free I-90 was built, the designation was moved onto the free portion of road. Additionally, there were talks in 1999 between state and federal officials about the possibility of moving I-90 back onto the unsigned portion of the Berkshire Spur, while extending I-88 onto what we know as free I-90. There would have also had been an I-88/I-90 multiplex between Rotterdam and Albany as a result. http://www.timesunion.com/AspStories/story.asp?storyID=916307
Post a Comment
Read more