Skip to main content

California State Route 63

Today's featured California highway is one with a really strange and elusive history; California State Route 63. 


CA 63 is a 38 mile north/south route running from CA 137 in Tulare in Tulare County to CA 180 in Fresno County.  CA 63 is a good mix of urban highway and rural country roads in the Sierra Nevada Foothills.



A drive on California State Route 63 and it's history

I started my journey on CA 63 out from the southern terminus in Tulare.  Originally CA 63 reached US 99 in Tulare along Tulare Avenue which is now CA 137.  According CAhighways.org CA 63 was cut back to the current terminus at CA 137 back in 1965.  It would seem that CA 63 multiplexed CA 137 to US 99 when it was renumbered from unsigned Legislative Route Number 134 in 1964:

CAhighways.org on CA 63

A quick view east on Tulare Avenue/CA 137 east to the southern terminus of CA 63 at Mooney Boulevard.



Mooney Boulevard runs north five miles to the city limit of Visalia as an expressway with an odd speed limit of 60 MPH.


CA 63 north follows Mooney Boulevard north another four miles to Noble Avenue where it multiplexes onto the CA 198 freeway for about half a mile.  CA 63 exits immediately back onto Noble Avenue and turns north into downtown Visalia as a one-way highway on Court Street.







CA 63 north follows Court Street to Oval Park where it uses a large roundabout to exit onto Northwest 3rd Avenue.  CA 63 north meets CA 63 south at Dinuba Boulevard which it uses to exit the northern city limits of Visalia near the St. John's River.  For reference CA 63 south uses West Street, Northwest 2nd Avenue, Locust Street, and Mineral King Avenue to reach the CA 63 freeway.







At Avenue 328 CA 63 meets the unsigned County Route J34.

 
Tulare County is infamously bad at signing designated County Routes, in fact the only one I ever found that was signed in the field was J37:

Yokohl Valley Drive/Mountain Route 296 and CR J37 on AAroads

Between Visalia and Cutler CA 63 is a two-lane road which briefly multiplexes CA 201.  CA 201 splits west towards Kingsburg just south of the Cutler CDP line.







CA 63 becomes a four-lane road in Cutler which continues north to Orosi.



At the intersection of Avenue 416/El Monte Way is the junction with unsigned County Route J40 on the left westbound.  Eastbound on El Monte Way was once LRN 130 and likely once CA 63 into the Sierras to a terminus at CA 65.  The road north was once an extension of LRN 132 to Orange Cove.


The junction above is where the history of CA 63 gets murky.  From my own map research CA 63 first appears over what was LRN 132 from US 99 north to Orosi in 1950:

1950 Division of Highways Map 


The 1950 State Highway Map doesn't show a signed state highway on LRN 130.  However, NE2 from the AAroads Forum pointed out that a Topographical map from 1950 showing CA 63 running east of Orosi to CA 65.  This topographical map can be viewed on historicaerials.com.  In my own research I located a 1956 Shell Highway Map of California showing CA 63 running east of Orosi to CA 65.

1956 Shell Highway Map


In 1964 during the California Highway Renumbering LRN 132 north of Orosi was reassigned as CA 226 but was never apparently signed in the field.

1964 Division of Highways Map


The 1966 State Highway Map shows CA 226 renumbered as CA 63 which a new un-built extension to CA 180.  CA 63 is also still shown running east out of Orosi to what was once CA 65 renumbered to CA 69.

1966 Division of Highways Map


Interestingly the planned route of CA 63 north of Orange Cove was part of the original alignment of Signed County Route J19.  J19 was created in 1964 according to CAhighways and is shown terminating at CA 180 on the 1966 Goshua Highway Map of California.


By 1967 the State Highway Map shows what was LRN 130/CA 63 east of Orosi removed as a state highway.  The road north to Orange Cove with the un-built segment of CA 63 to CA 180 is still not complete.

1967 Division of Highways Map


By the 1969 Division of Highways Map CA 63 is shown running north from Orosi to CA 180 in the Sierra Foothills.

1969 Division of Highways Map


So, with all that in mind the road north of Orosi is rural and quickly drops to two-lanes.  CA 63 runs north on Road 128 before taking a western turn on Avenue 460.  At Park Boulevard CA 63 meets the limits of Orange Cove, the Fresno County Line, and County Route J19.  J19 runs south from Orange Cove on Hill Valley Road and is signed given it is in Fresno County.  Odd to think that this small section of road was once the full extent CA 226.












North of Orange Cover CA 63 runs on Hills Valley Road which quickly approaches the Sierra Foothills.



The grade uphill in the last two/three miles of CA 63 is deceptively huge and gains about 1,000 feet in elevation before meeting CA 180.  Last year I warped my left front brake rotor descending to San Joaquin Valley on this grade given that I hit my brakes so hard to slow down after being caught off guard by the grade.  I would speculate this section of CA 63 is a 10% grade in places but I could be wrong.  Caltrans is horrible at publishing information on grade percentages, I often use cycling websites for grade information in California.  CA 63 ends without and "end" placard but has a decent overlook down into San Joaquin Valley.







Update 11/9/19:  During map research this year I noticed that US Route 99 may have been planned to be signed on current CA 63 on Mooney Boulevard from Visalia south to Tulare.   US 99 appears on Mooney Bouelvard on a 1925 Rand McNally Junior Highway Map of California.  Said Rand McNally Map has several early US Route System draft items like US 60 in place of US 66 and US 91 ending near Bannock instead of Dagget.  LRN 4 likely was aligned through Visalia and Tulare via Mooney Boulevard but it is likely US 99 never was.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The history of US Route 80 and Interstate 8 in California

The historic corridor of US Route 80 and Interstate 8 through the borderlands of southern California share a largely mutual history.  Both highways originated in the city of San Diego and departed the state at the Colorado River into Yuma, Arizona.  Both highways share numerous famous geographical components such as the Mountain Springs Grade and Algodones Sand Dunes.  This article serves as a comprehensive history of the combined US Route 80/Interstate 8 corridor in California from the tolled stage route era of the nineteenth century to the development of the modern freeway.   The blog cover photo features US Route 80 along the Mountains Springs Grade through In-Ko-Pah Gorge during late 1920s.  This photo is part of the Caltrans McCurry Collection. Part 1; the history of US Route 80 and Interstate 8 in California US Route 80 and Interstate 8 in California share a largely mutual history.  The backstory of both highways is tied heavily to the corridors of the Old Spanish Trail, Legisl

The Midway Palm and Pine of US Route 99

Along modern day California State Route 99 south of Avenue 11 just outside the City limits of Madera one can find the Midway Palm and Pine in the center median of the freeway.  The Midway Palm and Pine denotes the halfway point between the Mexican Border and Oregon State Line on what was US Route 99.  The Midway Palm is intended to represent Southern California whereas the Midway Pine is intended to represent Northern California.  Pictured above the Midway Palm and Pine can be seen from the northbound lanes of the California State Route 99 Freeway.   This blog is part of the larger Gribblenation US Route 99 Page.  For more information pertaining to the other various segments of US Route 99 and it's three-digit child routes check out the link the below. Gribblenation US Route 99 Page The history of the Midway Palm and Pine The true timeframe for when the Midway Palm and Pine (originally a Deadora Cedar Tree) were planted is unknown.  In fact, the origin of the Midway Palm and Pine w

North Carolina Continues to Move Forward with Rail

2023 and the first half of 2024 have seen continued growth in North Carolina's passenger rail system.  From increased daily trains from Raleigh to Charlotte, federal funds for studying additional corridors, and receiving a historic grant to begin the construction of high-speed rail between Raleigh and Richmond, the last 18 months have been a flurry of activity at NCDOT's Rail Division.  And that's just the tip of the iceberg. As ridership and routes increase - the engine of North Carolina passenger rail trains will become a more common sight. (Adam Prince) Increased Passenger Train Service: On July 10, 2023, a fourth Piedmont round-trip rail service between Raleigh and Charlotte commenced.  The four Piedmont trains plus the daily Carolinian (to Washington, DC, and New York) bring the total of trains serving the two cities daily to five. The current daily Piedmont and Carolinian schedule between Charlotte and Raleigh (NCDOT) The result was over 641,000 passengers utilized pa